Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Prince Naseem Hamed a hall of famer??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by ds91 View Post
    hell .... NO!!
    My thoughts also!!!

    Comment


    • #82
      Without a doubt, he was good for boxing and was arguably the most powerfull punching featherweight of all time, who can forget his devastating knock out of Augie Sanchez (a guy who beat Mayweather as an amateur) the commisioners of the fight demanded to see his gloves after because they couldnt beleive the Power.

      and he beat MANY good fighters Madina, Paul Ingle and Soto come to mind.
      He also made good fighters look average (Steve Robinson and Boom Boom Johnson)

      Comment


      • #83
        Actually, those were average fighters that made Hamed look great until Hamed ran into a real great fighter: Barrera, who made Hamed look less than average.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by SnoopySmurf View Post
          Actually, those were average fighters that made Hamed look great until Hamed ran into a real great fighter: Barrera, who made Hamed look less than average.
          He was certainly beaten well but to say he made Hamed look less than average is crazy. Barrera won by 5 rds, 3 rds and 3 rds on the cards, Barrera if you recall boxed behind a high guard and outboxed Hamed.

          Tatically he found a way to beat Hamed but purely by the manner in the way he boxed shows that he had respect for Hameds power so to say he made him look less than average........?

          Hamed was a big mouth and ****y but he was an excellent fighter, every knowledgeable boxing fan can see that..surely?

          Comment


          • #85
            People who say Hamed shouldnt be in there cannot justify why Tyson should be in there.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Naz-Fan View Post
              People who say Hamed shouldnt be in there cannot justify why Tyson should be in there.
              This has already been argued and I won.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by lyrical View Post
                Without a doubt, he was good for boxing and was arguably the most powerfull punching featherweight of all time, who can forget his devastating knock out of Augie Sanchez (a guy who beat Mayweather as an amateur) the commisioners of the fight demanded to see his gloves after because they couldnt beleive the Power.

                and he beat MANY good fighters Madina, Paul Ingle and Soto come to mind.
                He also made good fighters look average (Steve Robinson and Boom Boom Johnson)


                You do know that prior to facing Hamed, Augie Sanchez was knocked unconscious (with one punch) by a journeyman ? It took a helluva a lot
                more Hamed punches to take out Augie, didn't it ? Augie also did virtually
                nothing to earn that shot at hamed, & yet he still dropped Hamed (horrendous missed-call by the ref) & looked like he had a great shot at beating Hamed. The Sanchez fight, is certainly no fight for a Hamed supporter to hang his hat on......not for power or for accomplishment.
                Did you see when Augie fought John Michael Johnson ? Yeah, knocked out cold by the first punch Johnson threw at him.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Naz-Fan View Post
                  People who say Hamed shouldnt be in there cannot justify why Tyson should be in there.
                  tyson remains the youngest heavyweight champion ever at 20yrs, that record doesnt look like getting broken any time soon so fo this reason alone i think tyson deserves his place in the hof

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    My vote is no, after barrera he should have kept fighting to show the world he wasn't a fluke.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Rane-Ex54 View Post
                      My vote is no, after barrera he should have kept fighting to show the world he wasn't a fluke.
                      a fluke is a one-time thing.

                      hamed beat world class featherweights for 5 years.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP