Simply Impossible. That Peter got a UD over Mccline

[Dick-Sucker]

Someone explain this to me. I have said it before and no one can bring in some judging experience.

1 knockdown in the sencond (win round by 2 points)
2 knockdowns in the third (Win round by three points.

After three rounds Mccline has a 4 point lead over Peter. (peter won the first round)

Mccline definetely won at least another 2 rounds minimum. I gave him the 6th and 8th and the 10th could have gone either way.

Logic says it was close to impossible for Peter to UD him, with those judging methods. Please explain your reason why Peter won the fight on points, using jugding methods and experience, cheers.

[Undefeated]

**** happens man. The judges be ****ing **** up.

[Kball15]

I thought Peter definetly won the fight, and i think plently more people will agree with me then u. Or at least those who know how to score a fight.

McCline blew a massive oppurtunity in those first few rounds, and thats that

[Kball15]

Someone explain this to me. I have said it before and no one can bring in some judging experience.

1 knockdown in the sencond (win round by 2 points)
2 knockdowns in the third (Win round by three points.

After three rounds Mccline has a 4 point lead over Peter. (peter won the first round)

Mccline definetely won at least another 2 rounds minimum. I gave him the 6th and 8th and the 10th could have gone either way.

Logic says it was close to impossible for Peter to UD him, with those judging methods. Please explain your reason why Peter won the fight on points, using jugding methods and experience, cheers.

o and ur logic is all wrong

u give mccline a total of 7 points over Peter in a total of 5 rounds.

That leaves 7 rounds left for Peter to win, and get points from

Its not 7 ROUNDS that u have McCline winning, ur giving him 7 POINTS.

u see what im saying? I think if u added up ur totals u would actually have a draw so...