how did you score mayweather-de la hoya?

[newforce]

I had oscar winning by 1 round, if not it was probably a draw.
I rewatched the fight,and I slow played the actual encounters they had with each other, and it was clear , that Pbf came off 2nd best.

[Derranged]

115-112 for Floyd, but I could see 116-112 as well. No way DLH won that fight.

[Fox McCloud]

115-112 for Floyd, but I could see 116-112 as well. No way DLH won that fight.

What round did you score 10-8?

I'm so confused by anyone who's scores don't add up to 238... there is no way any rounds should have been less than 10-9.

[Knocked Out]

Negative ****ing 100

[Fox McCloud]

Negative ****ing 100

OH MY GOD!

When did Harold Lederman get an account on here?

He is the only person in the world who can give a score that ****ed up.

[squealpiggy]

I scored Oscar one round ahead, but there were lots of rounds that could have gone either way. If you scored every single one of those for Floyd I could see a 116-112 finish in his favour, I had it 115-114 for De La Hoya.

Fact about that fight is that Floyd landed the cleaner punches but De La Hoya landed the more effective punches. Neither gained the upper hand in terms of ring generalship, and they were both defending well, with Mayweather avoiding taking too much damage and Hoya picking off most of Floyd's flurries. A lot of rounds came down to who was actually pressing the action, and we all know who that was.

Calling it a dominant performance by Mayweather is insane. He squeaked by and the result reflected that. Takng nothing away from Floyd for the victory, it's quite a name to have on your record, but if you call that a one-sided affair (as some of you seem to be doing) you're rewriting history.

[Fox McCloud]

I scored Oscar one round ahead, but there were lots of rounds that could have gone either way. If you scored every single one of those for Floyd I could see a 116-112 finish in his favour, I had it 115-114 for De La Hoya.

Fact about that fight is that Floyd landed the cleaner punches but De La Hoya landed the more effective punches. Neither gained the upper hand in terms of ring generalship, and they were both defending well, with Mayweather avoiding taking too much damage and Hoya picking off most of Floyd's flurries. A lot of rounds came down to who was actually pressing the action, and we all know who that was.

Calling it a dominant performance by Mayweather is insane. He squeaked by and the result reflected that. Takng nothing away from Floyd for the victory, it's quite a name to have on your record, but if you call that a one-sided affair (as some of you seem to be doing) you're rewriting history.

I thought he won a lot of those close rounds clearly...

It depends on what you call a dominating performance. If winning a bunch of close rounds is dominant, then yes it was dominant.

Barrera-Morales III was a dominant performance, even though Barrera just won a lot of those close rounds clearly.

[Boxing_Girl23]

I don't like Maywether, but he did win the fight by at least 1-2 points

[squealpiggy]

It depends on what you call a dominating performance. If winning a bunch of close rounds is dominant, then yes it was dominant.

No, to me a dominant performance is one in which the victor is the clear winner in the rounds he wins. Not one where your scorecard is filled in hesitatingly because you don't want to score the round 10-10 but you're not sure who will get the nod.

[Knocked Out]

And I Give Zab Judah's Chicken Dance.... Priceless!!!