Last night is the reason why nobody buys the PPVs.......
Last night's fight just adds to the lackluster sales...
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
It shouldn't have been a PPV. It wasn't even a meaningful fight compared to last week's and the upcoming Calz-Kessler and Cotto-Mosley, yet this one was a ppv?
I have it on my computer now but I sure as hell didn't drop fifty for that **** -
If they want to save boxing PPV has to go! Look at all the attention Pavlik Taylor got on HBO. So everybody takes a little less. They're all still rich and more fans for the sport..SIMPLE!Last edited by Southpaw21; 10-07-2007, 09:53 AM.Comment
-
I concur, get rid of PPV alltogether, except for the most meaningful of fights, that way the sport can get plenty of exposure.Comment
-
first of all id like to point out that i cant believe people didnt anticipate a boring fight.
I could have been really exciting if Barrera tried to back Pacqioau up, but Barrera has been talking about boxing pacquiao for months
And 2nd of all That was a wonderful undercard, which is why people usually feel satisfied wit PPV's.
I didnt buy it personally, but i dont think anybody should be really pissed if they didComment
-
I agree with Kball. I dont know why anyone would want to buy this PPV unless they were a die hard MAB/Pac fan. No one ever said this would be a war. After the second Juarez fight especially. This will all be forgotten in a week when Diaz vs. Diaz goes down next week.Comment
-
the diaz fight wont last 4 rds and then they will go abck to talking about this fight
Comment
Comment