Marquez vs. Pacquiao I - was a draw the right decision?
Collapse
-
oh yeah they only want to fight him when they are about to retire so that they will have excuses. if they lose they will say oh i am old, oh i am slow now, oh i have been to many battles. ****ing great way for an excuse for them eh. hey when is ur dad going to retire for craving of ****s and *******s?Comment
-
When you get one knockdown it makes the score for the round 10-8 if you were winning the round. 2 knockdowns makes it 10-7. 3 knockdowns make it 10-6. PERIOD. It was scored incorrectly. Pac would have had the win if it were scored right. End thread.Comment
-
-
That's not the question being asked though...
It is asking whether you thought the judges made the right call in each of the rounds (whether they were given to Marquez or Pacquiao). We all know about that moron judge who scored the first round 10-7, even though all 3 knockdowns were not flash knockdowns. However, I think some judges gave certain rounds to Pacquiao that shouldn't have been given to him.Comment
-
Marquez won pretty much every single round after the first round. He won that fight, he knew he won it and so did Pac. He looked like a beaten man waiting for word from the judges to come down. Marquez was out and out robbed.Comment
-
-
Your opinion is rendered moot.
The judge who made the error in scoring admitted his "mistake", he said Pac should have won instead of a draw.
Argument ended.Comment
-
That is your opinion.That's not the question being asked though...
It is asking whether you thought the judges made the right call in each of the rounds (whether they were given to Marquez or Pacquiao). We all know about that moron judge who scored the first round 10-7, even though all 3 knockdowns were not flash knockdowns. However, I think some judges gave certain rounds to Pacquiao that shouldn't have been given to him.
But as it stands, an error in judging rounds coupled with an admission has saved Marquez with a draw.Comment
-
Comment
Comment