Jermaine Taylor is a punk for loseing

[BrooklynBomber]

Da more i think about it da more i think he is a lil punk, i dont care how hard he fought or that he had Pavlik hurt he gave that fight away and like many said his decline was inevitable,,, first he barley beats Hopkins once let alone twice then he luckily gets a draw with Winky, he cant even knock out the much smaller Ouma and Spinks had he been on the juice woulda styled on him.... Kelly Pavlik is my new favorite boxer and ima eventually KO his ass oneday..... But with that said dis is Greatest my account wasnt hyjacked im just tellin you how i feel as of now... As much as id love to see Taylor redeem himself in the rematch when you think about it Kelly is a true warrior adn would be a great in any era i don tknow if that could be said for the now mediocure Taylor!


So Jermaine hit the gym brother and redeem yourself cuz if you get KOed again i aint ****ing wit you homey!

Wow, what a dumb ****.

[boxingfan4life]

I wouldnt go as far as calling him a punk. He was in the ring with a very powerful fighter and just got caught. If you pay attention to the fight before the stoppage he wasnt doing that bad. Its not like he was dominated the whole fight. It was just a classic case of slowly breaking down your opponent and thats what pavlik did. Good victory for pavlik but i think its unfair to write taylor off because of this. I say wait and see what he does in the rematch before judging him.

[THe TRiNiTY]

y is he a punk? he got beat by a better fighter. it happens everyday in boxing. dont call him a punk.

Stronger puncher, not a better fighter. Skill-wise, technically Taylor SHOULD have shown how much of a better fighter he really is. The fact that he didn't doesn't mean that he isn't. I'm not saying he BLOWS Pavlik out of the water, but overall, he's a more well-rounded fighter.

- Better footwork, quicker, better jab (normally), more head movement, upperbody movement as a whole, decent combinations. He just didn't fight smart and got beat by a pretty good fighter who hits harder than he does. I take nothing away from Pavlik.

[Verstyle]

Hoskins must of had some money on him.

[GreatestIam]

i had a coo 250 on da motah****a but dats beside the point

[The Troll]

Stronger puncher, not a better fighter. Skill-wise, technically Taylor SHOULD have shown how much of a better fighter he really is. The fact that he didn't doesn't mean that he isn't. I'm not saying he BLOWS Pavlik out of the water, but overall, he's a more well-rounded fighter.

- Better footwork, quicker, better jab (normally), more head movement, upperbody movement as a whole, decent combinations. He just didn't fight smart and got beat by a pretty good fighter who hits harder than he does. I take nothing away from Pavlik.

If he was a better fighter he would have won the fight. It' simple as that, he went to his grade A training game in the poconos. Thats Jermaine Taylor and Pavlik was just better.

[Verstyle]

i had a coo 250 on da motah****a but dats beside the point

Naw,that IS the point. Maybe ppl didnt know that or saw that. I think anyone would be pissed if they lost money.

[Sin City]

Is it me or are these threads fishy as hell??

[niceguy45]

Skillwise, there is absolutely no reason on earth Taylor lost that fight. He fought a horrible gameplan and still had Pavlik out on his feet EARLY. I lost a lot of respect for Manny Steward that fight. But I guess that's part of what makes boxing so great. Only in boxing could talents like Taylor and Judah lose to guys like Pavlik and Cotto.

wow, U read my mind, and typed it b4 i did......agree

[The Troll]

Skillwise, there is absolutely no reason on earth Taylor lost that fight. He fought a horrible gameplan and still had Pavlik out on his feet EARLY. I lost a lot of respect for Manny Steward that fight. But I guess that's part of what makes boxing so great. Only in boxing could talents like Taylor and Judah lose to guys like Pavlik and Cotto.

What better skills? Pavlik had the better jab, the better more concicse punches, apart from the lapse in round 2, did a good job blocing Taylor's punches, he controlled the pace, he controlled where the fight was fought. What 'skills' are you talking about.

People use this word all the time, what ****ing meaning does it have. It's almost always used in this context as well. Somebody gets knocked out, or would get knocked out, Diego or somebody like him is there to say 'well so and so has more 'skills.' Whatever the **** that means in knockout defeats.