Ricky Hatton : Guinness....and Greed?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mozza
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2006
    • 3802
    • 233
    • 174
    • 12,277

    #81
    Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO
    There are 10-8 rounds without a KD.

    See Mayweather-Gatti round 6.
    Did you see any 10-8 rounds in the Hatton/Collazo fight? I only saw one.

    Comment

    • DIOS DOMINICANO
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 11119
      • 493
      • 206
      • 12,010

      #82
      Originally posted by Wiley Hyena
      Dios, why don't you just write a book about all the reasons you can think of to run Hatton down? lol My God, are you on Floyd's payroll, or what?
      wiley.... I didn't write the article. It was posted on a website, and it was information that had not been discussed here. So, rather than having siomebody create the 437th thread about Oscar wearing fishnets...or having the 789th thread about who "won" the press conferences, I posted the article here for discussion.

      The author clearly means to provoke, which is why he put his email addy on there. Why don't you contact him?

      And I posted the article without my commentary. Just like I posted that article from the guy who excoriated Floyd a couple of days ago.


      Are you THAT hypersensitive that you feel the need to attack somebody because a third person wrote an article?

      Men don't do that. Please show some basic level of masculinity. You are embarrassing yourself.

      Comment

      • squealpiggy
        Stritctly UG's friend
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2007
        • 28896
        • 2,028
        • 1,603
        • 66,600

        #83
        I did respond, purely to offer the advice that it's a good idea to have evidence before you start making accusations. I didn't even address to usual "Hatton has no chance" bilge because he's entitled to his opinion, but the heart of the article was factually inaccurate.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP