Seeing both of their public personalities I honestly like Hatton, he seems like a great guy you'd love to sit down and have a beer with .There is no doubt that he believes in himself and you can't take away from his awesome acomplishments. Mayweather as a person seems to be what I can only call, a punk. Two things I'll say about Mayweather, he'll beat Hatton rather easilly and like Mike Tyson before him will end up in trouble and broke when his boxing skills can no longer keep him in the lime light or out of trouble. I'm just hoping he doesn't decide to also get his face tattooed!!! I think Mayweather will completely dominate Hatton and I'm so sure of this I won't even pay to see it as I'm pretty sure it will be completely one sided after the first couple of rounds.
We're not on that subject firstly because this isn't the thread, and secondly because body language/communication theory doesn't follow any specific scientific paradigm, namely "amateur psychology", so you're just confused..
Body Language DOES come under the umbrella subject of Psychology. Dont believe me, go and look it up. Now, if you were a professional psychologist I would assume that you'd know that fact to be true, so as you arent, I feel 100% justified to label your woefully one-sided and short-sighted attempt at judging body language to be 'amateur psychology'.
Body Language DOES come under the umbrella subject of Psychology. Dont believe me, go and look it up. Now, if you were a professional psychologist I would assume that you'd know that fact to be true, so as you arent, I feel 100% justified to label your woefully one-sided and short-sighted attempt at judging body language to be 'amateur psychology'.
We see that you obviously don't even posses the rudimentary knowledge to even address "amateur psychology", since reading an overt action as opposed to interpreting an action in its relationship to neural processes, are two different things. I commented on non-verbal communication, not the underlying effects or mechanism of it. Please understand the distinction and conversely, I suggest YOU look it up...
We see that you obviously don't even posses the rudimentary knowledge to even address "amateur psychology", since reading an overt action as opposed to interpreting an action in its relationship to neural processes, are two different things. I commented on non-verbal communication,not the underlying effects or mechanism of it. Please understand the distinction...
Comment