Gerry Penalosa Wants Three More Fights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xcaret
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 11306
    • 481
    • 675
    • 12,939

    #41
    Originally posted by Papa Ace
    he is calling them out of desperation, *****. his reputation is down. he's suppose to be ripe what like 6 yeards ago??? he even wont go half as far as vargas went. perfect example of your favorite term -- "over-hyped bum".

    forbes is a journeyman who's on a losing streak, and if you think he is a good stepping stone for panchito, you can only be that ******.

    paulie have not signified any intention to fight panchito and he needs to rematch cotto rather than face that over-hyped bum.

    gerry is a world champion. live with that.
    you try so hard to have a valid boxing opinion but you dont know **** about it, you fail. Quit coming here and go to the pinoy land aka pac nuthugger site.

    Forbes IS a good step up fight for him because hes was inactive for a few years. Malignaggi is a ***** and would get his ass knocked out by Bojado.

    Comment

    • Papa Ace
      Bumibira Kahit Kurbada
      • Jan 2006
      • 0
      • 228
      • 197
      • 22,142

      #42
      Originally posted by xcaret
      you try so hard to have a valid boxing opinion but you dont know **** about it, you fail. Quit coming here and go to the pinoy land aka pac nuthugger site.

      Forbes IS a good step up fight for him because hes was inactive for a few years. Malignaggi is a ***** and would get his ass knocked out by Bojado.
      paulie doesnt need panchito doesnt mean he's a *****. its panchito who needs paulie.


      inactive or mismanaged? so he has to fight someone with a losing streak so he can get back in winning form because he was inactive, yeah right.

      he was impressive in the first few years yes, but after he was exposed by rubio, he went downwards. youre sucking his **** as if it was 2001 youre pathetic.
      Last edited by Papa Ace; 09-18-2007, 05:25 AM.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP