Which is worse?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fox McCloud
    Mission Complete!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 18176
    • 789
    • 1,151
    • 26,037

    #1

    Which is worse?

    Two fights medal at the olympics (not in the same year). Each takes a different course in their career. Let's examine them separately:

    Fighter 1: Coming off a great performance at the Olympics, he quickly starts off beating losers in 4, 6 and 8 rounders (like everyone does), and starts to make a big name for himself. He cleans out a division, and then moves up. After that he collects belts from beltholders who seem to be champions only on paper, in other words, he beats the #3 or #4 fighter in each division. He is undefeated, and he wins nearly all his contests in dominating fashion, but can't seem to get any respect from anyone.

    Fighter 2: Also had a great performance at the Olympics, he beats loser in 4, 6 and 8 round fights as well. He is still young and beats a couple of good fighters before taking on the kingpin of his division. He beats him and faces other top P4P challengers for his belt. He keeps winning his fights by razor-thin margins. He was getting respect after he won his titles, but now people are starting to turn on him, and his respect level is plummeting.

    Which is worse?

    I'm sure most people can guess who the two fighters are. You can do that too if you want.
  • squealpiggy
    Stritctly UG's friend
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2007
    • 28896
    • 2,028
    • 1,603
    • 66,600

    #2
    Is one of them Audley Harrison?

    Comment

    • Fox McCloud
      Mission Complete!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2007
      • 18176
      • 789
      • 1,151
      • 26,037

      #3
      Originally posted by squealpiggy
      Is one of them Audley Harrison?
      No.

      Comment

      • Smokin'
        Man On Fire
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 10227
        • 427
        • 407
        • 12,939

        #4
        Mayweather and Taylor?

        Comment

        • Fox McCloud
          Mission Complete!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 18176
          • 789
          • 1,151
          • 26,037

          #5
          Originally posted by Smokin'
          Mayweather and Taylor?
          Very good.

          Now the question, which is worse? Because no one (except their die hard fans) seems to like or give any respect to them.

          Comment

          • Smokin'
            Man On Fire
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 10227
            • 427
            • 407
            • 12,939

            #6
            Taylor. He is taking on the best and the real champions. Guys like Mosley, Taylor, Hopkins, etc etc you HAVE to respect.

            Comment

            • pesticid
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2006
              • 7236
              • 456
              • 500
              • 20,597

              #7
              I think Taylor even though he's been facing the very best. I mean he's been looking like **** his last 5 fights. Floyd hasn't looked the best but it's not cause his skills have diminished or his confidence is low. He's just fighting above his ideal weight, and his strenght and power are not there. Jermain is an oversized middleweight, fights former junior middleweight and welterweights and still looks weaker, go ****ing figure! I used to be Jemain's numebr 1 fan and now I almost hate him. I picked him to win against Hopkins but after his split with Burns he's been looking like dog ****. I am indifferent to Floyd. He's the most talented fighter today but I find him to be a phony.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP