De la hoya accused of **** and not paying child support

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pico Hollywood
    ars longa vita brevis
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2005
    • 9354
    • 463
    • 368
    • 17,724

    #21
    March 18, 2000 -- A woman who claims boxer Oscar De La Hoya ****d her when she was 15 years old failed to show evidence supporting her allegations and investigations by the Los Angeles police also failed to show evidence, rendering the case officially closed.

    "No formal charges were brought to us for filing," Victoria Pitkin of the District Attorney's office said . A statement released by De La Hoya's office said, "We are pleased this matter has been dropped. It is unfortunate when anyone is the victim of such baseless allegations."

    The woman, who has remained unidentified, made her allegations last Dec. 27, when she claimed that Oscar De La Hoya had assaulted her at a party at his house in West Los Angeles in 1996 and that his brother Joel De La Hoya ****d her at a hotel.

    De La Hoya, who always denied the accusation, was accused along with his brother in a civil lawsuit seeking monetary damages for ****, false imprisonment, sexual battery and assault. Her attorney, Taras Kick, said he is seeking in depositions to establish that "De La Hoya has a fetish with young girls and that he chased (the alleged victim) and he had sex with her ..."

    All those frivolous claims against Oscar De La Hoya have been dropped and the case is officially closed.

    Comment

    • ANDROID_DOES
      What Apple CANT!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 10265
      • 459
      • 205
      • 17,529

      #22
      Originally posted by loui_ludwig
      Dela Hoya has a lot of women fans and they all want to be **** by Dela Hoya.
      to say that he can **** ANYONE is non-sense yes they have alot of girls wanting them but they could come accross someone that doesnt give a **** ass about who they are and that can change a situation. Just cause people are good looking doesnt mean they are not capable look at kobe....let me guess he didnt do it either. I laugh at the ones saying im gonna get hit with a law suite ha ha thats no possible but with delahoy he would probably try to take every penny i have just like he does with boxing all about the benjamins. Look it up do some research this is a true story dlh wont talk about it but arum has talked about it many times. He's the one that forked out the million dollars to the lady to keep this out of the media. My intentions are to not make dlh look bad whatever i was just wondering if anyone else knows more details about this and how it went down.

      Comment

      • ANDROID_DOES
        What Apple CANT!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 10265
        • 459
        • 205
        • 17,529

        #23
        Originally posted by Pico Hollywood
        March 18, 2000 -- A woman who claims boxer Oscar De La Hoya ****d her when she was 15 years old failed to show evidence supporting her allegations and investigations by the Los Angeles police also failed to show evidence, rendering the case officially closed.

        "No formal charges were brought to us for filing," Victoria Pitkin of the District Attorney's office said . A statement released by De La Hoya's office said, "We are pleased this matter has been dropped. It is unfortunate when anyone is the victim of such baseless allegations."

        The woman, who has remained unidentified, made her allegations last Dec. 27, when she claimed that Oscar De La Hoya had assaulted her at a party at his house in West Los Angeles in 1996 and that his brother Joel De La Hoya ****d her at a hotel.

        De La Hoya, who always denied the accusation, was accused along with his brother in a civil lawsuit seeking monetary damages for ****, false imprisonment, sexual battery and assault. Her attorney, Taras Kick, said he is seeking in depositions to establish that "De La Hoya has a fetish with young girls and that he chased (the alleged victim) and he had sex with her ..."

        All those frivolous claims against Oscar De La Hoya have been dropped and the case is officially closed.
        I dont know where u got that from. but this never hit the surface because arum paid the girl a million dollars not because they didnt find evedince. Ima find the link now give me some time but the reason no charges were filed is because arum paid her off and that was that.

        Comment

        • ANDROID_DOES
          What Apple CANT!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 10265
          • 459
          • 205
          • 17,529

          #24
          this is from businessweek.com

          A Santa Barbara woman brought civil charges against De La Hoya for allegedly raping her at his condo in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, in 1996 when she was 15. And several managers have sued him over broken deals, including Hernandez and veteran promoter Bob Arum. Manager Shelly Finkel, who says he gave the fighter's family $100,000 to help care for De La Hoya's dying mother before the Olympics, claims he was stiffed when Oscar turned pro. Finkel and Hernandez have resolved their differences with Oscar and have no ill feelings toward him. Arum didn't return calls. De La Hoya denies the **** but says he settled with the woman "for a very low amount of money."

          here is the link to the whole article most of it non-relating to the **** except for the part i pasted. I will find arums link to this allegation.
          http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...2/b3946099.htm

          Comment

          • Pico Hollywood
            ars longa vita brevis
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2005
            • 9354
            • 463
            • 368
            • 17,724

            #25
            Could it have been more than 1 woman hmmm we will find out shortly

            Comment

            • eazy_mas
              Pride kills the champ
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2005
              • 9758
              • 244
              • 308
              • 17,756

              #26
              Originally posted by McNulty
              Your right...and you cant tell. But if you look @ stats...Most ****s occurs from whites and blacks in the states.

              I think DLH isnt as nice as he seems in real life. But the dude was a sex symbol...hot fems sweat-hogging him everywhere. Why would he **** someone in mexico of all places?

              He easily could have paid her off as a liar to keep his name out of the mud. You know how the media verks.

              I doubt a guy thats never been in a street fight and having the relationship he had w/his moms would ****. Usually rapists have bad relationships w/their moms.

              I'de bet money its some poor squatter-type hooker that saw a payday.
              what about Micheal Jackson i dont think he ****d that boy because there was a tv crew who investaged the boy and turned out to be following an orderd from a man who was a big time micheal jackson hater.

              Originally posted by wmute
              Oscar was wearing the names of his out of marriage kids on his trunks for the fight, the ailments thing is old stuff. how did it end? just because there is an accusation, is he guilty? i dont think so.

              **** is a bad thing, I heard the story, I somewhat believe it,

              young kid from east la goes to tijuana with money and friends, he does something bad. it's not an incredible story.

              On the other hand, anyone who drove to mexico knows something about the integrity of Law Enforcement there.

              in general, dont be silly, there is no bad guy and good guy, no black and white, no good and evil. Oscar is not superman and Floyd is not the bad guy.
              I was telling this to some people about the Vick dog fight case and told them nobody is 100% pure evil the problem with people that they look at a person doing one thing and based all there assumption it it which is wrong.

              If someone is ****y that does not mean he is not good boxer or he doesnt like his family the same if someone put a happy face in front of the media and got girl throwing panties that doesnt mean that he wouldnt ****.

              It better to go thing based on what you got and not what you assume because assumtion will only confuse you concentrate on one thing that can not lie and that is the evidence.
              Got it from CSI it was the first season i think the 2nd eps when Girosom gave tip to that black dude on the case of the person who shot someone on self protection clam but turned out that he murdered he, he knew it but didnt have evidence to backup his story and the same in here.

              But in this case you are spoiling someone reputation on it so it better to watch out the calim you are putting down if you are going to use it because then instead of destroying Oscar based on you assumtion you are spliting his whole family based on it and how people look at him.

              Comment

              • neils7147933
                Boxingscene Icon
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2004
                • 16261
                • 946
                • 2,279
                • 26,752

                #27
                None of us know if Oscar committed the crime or not. None of us were present at the alleged encounter.

                I understand the thought process where someone says if the girl got paid there must have been some guilt, but also DLH takes a crazy public relations hit if the story continues in the news, especially with a lesser burden of proof in a civil case than a criminal trial. The fact that this isn't regularly brought up on the forums is proof that the ordeal has been somewhat stifled.

                There are a number of boxers who mistreat women, at least allegedly, yet we still root for them. How many "he was a great man" tributes did we see for Corrales? Why is no one picketing outside the Mayorga press conferences?

                Thing is - I would never defend DLH as a person of great character because I don't know him. I'm limited to what I can see on TV or in the ring. Judgments help shape whether we root for someone or not - it takes legitimate proof to defend someone, or to accuse someone, though, and be credible doing so

                Comment

                • eazy_mas
                  Pride kills the champ
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2005
                  • 9758
                  • 244
                  • 308
                  • 17,756

                  #28
                  Originally posted by neils7147933
                  None of us know if Oscar committed the crime or not. None of us were present at the alleged encounter.

                  I understand the thought process where someone says if the girl got paid there must have been some guilt, but also DLH takes a crazy public relations hit if the story continues in the news, especially with a lesser burden of proof in a civil case than a criminal trial. The fact that this isn't regularly brought up on the forums is proof that the ordeal has been somewhat stifled.

                  There are a number of boxers who mistreat women, at least allegedly, yet we still root for them. How many "he was a great man" tributes did we see for Corrales? Why is no one picketing outside the Mayorga press conferences?

                  Thing is - I would never defend DLH as a person of great character because I don't know him. I'm limited to what I can see on TV or in the ring. Judgments help shape whether we root for someone or not - it takes legitimate proof to defend someone, or to accuse someone, though, and be credible doing so
                  I agree with you, what he does outside the ring i dont know that much and what he does in the ring and what the media present is all what i know.

                  some people look normal but they have some skelton in there closet.

                  and about Mayweather assualt they said it was allegation and it went to court and his ex-grilfriend admited that she did was wrong

                  Comment

                  • slicksouthpaw16
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 6374
                    • 259
                    • 501
                    • 16,743

                    #29
                    yeah i seen this biography about oscar and they said he has children out of wetlock that nobody has ever seen on camera. I dont hate oscar or nothing but he does have a fake image. he is not the perfect golden boy people see on tv. the **** thing is a lie because oscar can get any girl he wants.

                    Comment

                    • THe TRiNiTY
                      Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 10079
                      • 405
                      • 103
                      • 17,986

                      #30
                      These are pretty crazy claims to lay out there. Even if he did pay the woman hush money. It might have something to do with one of two things.

                      One.. if he DIDN'T do it, it might just be thathe doesn't even want the thought of something like this coming to the surface.

                      Two.. What if it did go to trial, and he somehow lost, when he was infact innocent (if he was).. That'd be so ****ed up, I might pay to avoid that possibility.

                      Not saying he did or didn't. I'm saying, none of us know. So, let's not make claims.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP