Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hatton: "I Have The Style To Beat Mayweather"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO View Post
    Collazo was out there BEGGING Hatton for a rematch but Hatton went and fought Urango.

    WHY?
    He UD'd the **** and Knocked him down. Why fight a guy you've already beaten?

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO View Post
      BUT BETTING ON THE BULL IS A SUCKER'S BET...NO?
      That depends on the bull and matador in question.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Randall_Hopkirk View Post
        He UD'd the **** and Knocked him down. Why fight a guy you've already beaten?
        Let's not forget he was almost finished in the 12th round, and that knockdown was a slip. Collazo wasn't hurt.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Randall_Hopkirk View Post
          He UD'd the **** and Knocked him down. Why fight a guy you've already beaten?
          I dunno: Maybe you wanna ask Joe Frazier that question. Or Erik Morales. Or Roberto Duran.

          Are you really a boxing fan?? Did you just ask that question?

          Man!! That's surprising.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO View Post
            BUT BETTING ON THE BULL IS A SUCKER'S BET...NO?
            No, there are plenty of good boxing styles. A lot of kids assume that because the best boxer right now is a slick defensive fighter, this must be the most effective style. That's just not true. At various times in history different styles have succeeded when the right guys were employing them. Look at the two of the biggest fights of the last half-century (Duran-SRL I and Ali-Frazier I) for examples of guys coming forward and murdering the slickest of boxers. The same could happen to Mayweather, if there were a Frazier or a Duran around.

            Hatton's style is fine, and he's even adaptable to some extent. Mayweather is just damn good.
            Last edited by kayjay; 07-30-2007, 03:46 PM.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by The_Executioner View Post
              Let's not forget he was almost finished in the 12th round, and that knockdown was a slip. Collazo wasn't hurt.
              Forget about that, it has nothing to do with this upcoming fight.

              And Hatton has no need to rematch Collazo, who has since lost again.

              Hatton got a fight with Mayweather, and DLH even mentioned him. There's no need to go backtracking

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by kayjay View Post
                No, there are plenty of good boxing styles. A lot of kids assume that because the best boxer right now is a slick defensive fighter, this must be the most effective style. That's just not true. At various times in history different styles have succeeded when the right guys were employing them. Look at the two of the biggest fights of the last half-century (Duran-SRL I and Ali-Frazier I) for examples of guys coming forward and murdering the slickest of boxers. The same could happen to Mayweather, if there were a Frazier or a Duran around.

                Hatton's style is fine, and he's even adaptable to some extent. Mayweather is just damn good.
                But the reality is that a review of the P4P history will show you what has been successful.

                The past few P4p's have been Mayweather, Hopkins, Jones, Whitaker, Oscar, Toney, and Chavez.

                And who did Chavez lose to?

                See what I mean?

                Good examples of SRL-Duran and Ali-Frazier.... Hey, quick question: what happened in the rematches? Who emerged as the better fighters?

                Comment


                • #78
                  why give collazo a rematch? well he clearly beat hatton 7 rounds to 5 and also knocked hatton down and had him out on his feet maybe thats why. if you want to run away then fine but don't claim your an intense warrior with a great style to beat people when you suck.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by goldenboy0620 View Post
                    you are ******
                    You are, I will bet you all my points that mayweather loses to hatton.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by satori555 View Post
                      why give collazo a rematch? well he clearly beat hatton 7 rounds to 5 and also knocked hatton down and had him out on his feet maybe thats why. if you want to run away then fine but don't claim your an intense warrior with a great style to beat people when you suck.

                      Collazo had nothing left to offer Hatton. If Collazo were to win a few more fights at 147 against big name fighters then perhaps Hatton would give him a rematch later down the line. But losing to Mosley is not the best way to go about that.

                      He didn't outpoint Hatton and he didn't have him out on his feet. Did you not notice that Hatton traded Collazo punch for punch even in the 12th round? However messy it looked, he had a steady head and was countering everything Collazo threw. I told you before, go and watch some more Hatton fights before commenting on his career when you have only seen his fights in America.

                      Wanker.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP