Hopkins calls out Calzaghe...

[PBDS]

.....**** that!!! Why would Calzonie fight that dirty ****er who really doesn't wanna fight? Head butts, holding, clinching, hugging, and no real fighting. **** Hopkins. He's garbage. Calzonie is better than that.

[Don Johnson]

You smoke crack, man.

He already said he'd fight Hopkins in the U.S.

He can say whatever the **** he wants to. It's whether or not his ***** ass is gonna go through with it.

[.Mik.]

If you think a Boxing resume and an employment resume are the same thing, dont apply for jobs, stay on welfare.

Edit, he answered above.

A resume is a ****ing resume. They are all the same thing. There is not a separate dictionary entry for 'boxing resume' you know?

Also, the irony to your unnecessary and unprovoked insult being that I am a well-paid college lecturer, whereas you have just finished a degree and are thus most likely unemployed.

You call the two best wins of Calzaghe's career 'B-List'?

One more time.


To be honest i still cant work out how you say Calzaghe's victories are equal to Hopkin's Victories.

Yet you said Hopkins Beating a blown up DLH and Trinadad was better than Calzaghe's two best wins, Eubank and Lacy,

How does that work?

I called Calzaghe's B-List to be B-List, I'm talking about the notch down from his best wins, not his top victories. Not his two best wins. I have said time and time again that the names on B-Hop's resume (as far as his A-List are concerned) are better than the names on Calzaghe's A-list. Thus as names on your resume...they are slightly better for your legacy. However, in terms of difficulty of beating (thus the manner of victory) Calzaghe's top two are no worse than B-Hop's top two.

I wish that you would not make me explain that same laborious information over and over again. I also wish that you'd drop the attitude once in a while and argue like a man, not an angry, petulant child.

[Technical_Skill]

A resume is a ****ing resume. They are all the same thing. There is not a separate dictionary entry for 'boxing resume' you know?

Also, the irony to your unnecessary and unprovoked insult being that I am a well-paid college lecturer, whereas you have just finished a degree and are thus most likely unemployed.



I called Calzaghe's B-List to be B-List, I'm talking about the notch down from his best wins, not his top victories. Not his two best wins. I have said time and time again that the names on B-Hop's resume (as far as his A-List are concerned) are better than the names on Calzaghe's A-list. Thus as names on your resume...they are slightly better for your legacy. However, in terms of difficulty of beating (thus the manner of victory) Calzaghe's top two are no worse than B-Hop's top two.

What is it with people here and assumptions about me? lol.

No, i am not unemployed, and i work for my own universitiy as a student advisor both with students and parents on and off, i finished uni, so i dunno if i will do that anymore, but yeah i have another job, although im looking for one which pays well, i got an okay degree so why not.

You didnt go into that detail before, yeah whatever, you went to alot of trouble there, getting a bit messy, i shall let it pass for now, its 1.53am and i feel like talking about Audley Harisson's WBF title, lol

[New Life 79]

What a bunch of bull**** i read here. People saing that Tito wasnt a challange for Bernard when they fought, because he wasnt fighting in his right weight division ????

Before Tito Fought Bernard, he smashed Joppy better then any fighter had done before or after and Tito was undefeated. He looked almost like a mini Tyson in that fight. If Hopkins doesnt get credit for that fight then Hagler shouldnt get any credit for beating Hearns, who didnt look as explosive at 160 compared to 147, before Hagler and after. Jesus the man is 42 what does people expect ??

[Don Johnson]

What a bunch of bull**** i read here. People saing that Tito wasnt a challange for Bernard when they fought, because he wasnt fighting in his right weight division ????

Before Tito Fought Bernard, he smashed Joppy better then any fighter had done before or after and Tito was undefeated. He looked almost like a mini Tyson in that fight. If Hopkins doesnt get credit for that fight then Hagler shouldnt get any credit for beating Hearns, who didnt look as explosive at 160 compared to 147, before Hagler and after. Jesus the man is 42 what does people expect ??

That's the ******est thing I've ever heard. How are you going to compare Hagler-Hopkins and Tito-Hearns? There's no comparison at all, Hopkins won every single round of that fight. Tito was never into the fight and never had a chance.I'd still give him partial credit b/c he is Tito Trinidad.

[hugh grant]

I hope Hopkins really wants JC this time. He made half hearted talks of a fight with JC just to stop JC beating Hopkins defence record.
But Hopkins win over Trinidad didnt do much for me. A not great british fighter dropped Trinidad. Cant remember the name of the Brit. He was from Beckenham.
Yes Hopkins resume of late has improved. With Tarver, and Wright on it. But befor that i didnt think much of it. Even thought it is better than JC by a little i favour Joe to beat Hopkins. If JC beats Kessler that will close the distance a bit more.

[New Life 79]

"There's no comparison at all, Hopkins won every single round of that fight. Tito was never into the fight and never had a chance.I'd still give him partial credit b/c he is Tito Trinidad."

And who had predicted that Hopkins was going to destroy Tito before there fight may i ask ?? Easy to come years after the fight and sound like an expert. The facts remains, Tito looked great moving up in middlewight. Or was you expecting him to smash Joppy inside 2 rounds perhaps ??
And Hopkins did that at age 36. Where was Marvin at 36 ?? 42 ???

Yeah Hopkins fights dirty sometimes and holds sometimes, but what else is new ?

[realheavyhands]

calzaghe dont want hopkins

[Tmb04]

I hope this happens, but I cant see Calzaghe fighting at Yankee Stadium...