That article is B.S. and so are all of your responses. I know that guy who wrote that and guess what? He's the same guy who was ripping Floyd over the Margarito thing and saying that Margarito was the man. All these guys favorite hyped up fighters lose and it makes them even more madder at Floyd. Its a joke.
All that stuff he said about KO's was so dumb. Floyd doesnt talk like that. No one even thinks like that for the fact that Floyd is super small, started at 130, and is not a KO type fighter anyway. Wow, Cotto dropped Zab? Like Cotto isnt going to be more capable of knocking out someone then Floyd? That dont prove ****. Cotto started at 140 and was a ****ing house at that weight. Hatton stopped Castillo? Hatton also started at 140, Castillo is past his prime, he ****** in his last fight, and it was only his 2nd fight at 140 while Hatton walks around at nearly a 190 pounds.
Floyd knocks out Mitchell in 6 and Williams does it in 4 but he thinks that makes Floyd look bad when Floyd did it 1st and Williams is like a ****ing MW? Then because Williams schools a guy that Floyd said was garbage anyway, he's supposed to give Williams all these props? That article was so ****** and biased
All that stuff he said about KO's was so dumb. Floyd doesnt talk like that. No one even thinks like that for the fact that Floyd is super small, started at 130, and is not a KO type fighter anyway. Wow, Cotto dropped Zab? Like Cotto isnt going to be more capable of knocking out someone then Floyd? That dont prove ****. Cotto started at 140 and was a ****ing house at that weight. Hatton stopped Castillo? Hatton also started at 140, Castillo is past his prime, he ****** in his last fight, and it was only his 2nd fight at 140 while Hatton walks around at nearly a 190 pounds.
Floyd knocks out Mitchell in 6 and Williams does it in 4 but he thinks that makes Floyd look bad when Floyd did it 1st and Williams is like a ****ing MW? Then because Williams schools a guy that Floyd said was garbage anyway, he's supposed to give Williams all these props? That article was so ****** and biased
Comment