Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Do You Think of Hatton's Resume?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Hatton has a good resume, he is an undefeated two weight World Champion?

    He has fought less known but dangerous opponents and the odd very good opponent.

    Castillo and Tszyu only became shot fighters after Hatton beat them....

    He will become a great fighter if he ever beats the likes of a Cotto or Mayweather.

    Comment


    • #62
      Hatton has a very, very good resume as regard who he has beaten. I am assuming there are a few with better resumes. Im not saying who has a better resume.

      It doesnt neccesarily have to be PBF who i think has a better one. There are probably lots of people who would argue that Hatton has the better resume as regard the calibreo of opposition he has fought. It is all down to opinions at the end of the day.
      Last edited by hugh grant; 07-11-2007, 10:01 AM.

      Comment


      • #63
        Jesus $IN, I only come on here about twice a week but there is always a ' Hatton is crap' type thread on here from you!

        Are you OK mate??? Has Ricky shagged your sister or something?

        As for the thread.

        Hatton does have a good resume, just because many of the fighters on there aren't classed as lb 4 lb greats doesn't mean they weren't or aren't good fighters.

        Anyone who says Hatton is an average fighter shouldn't be posting on a boxing site.

        And before you call me a Hatton nuthugger, I don't really like the kid but I recognise a good fighter when I see one.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Likely_Lad View Post
          Jesus $IN, I only come on here about twice a week but there is always a ' Hatton is crap' type thread on here from you!

          Are you OK mate??? Has Ricky shagged your sister or something?

          As for the thread.

          Hatton does have a good resume, just because many of the fighters on there aren't classed as lb 4 lb greats doesn't mean they weren't or aren't good fighters.

          Anyone who says Hatton is an average fighter shouldn't be posting on a boxing site.

          And before you call me a Hatton nuthugger, I don't really like the kid but I recognise a good fighter when I see one.

          Actually I think it was one of $IN's better threads. He had some good poll options there and the thread in general was IMHO pretty fair with there assesment.

          Overall I think this was a good thread.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by adamk1304 View Post
            So i can't be a fan of uk fighters without being a "nuthugger"?, **** off you ******. I guess those punches from tarver and johnson got to your head aswell as roy's.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by SMC View Post
              What a ****** comment to make, I suggest you watch his other fights rather then judging Ricky on his last couple of performances,
              This is bull****, if he looks better it's because they were against even bigger bums than those he fights now. Tyson KOd bums and past-their-prime fighters in the first round for the first 5 years of his career. Did he do this to the top dogs in the division when he finally stepped up the level of his competition? **** NO. Bottom line - it's easy to look good against ****ty fighters, and saying "look at his past fights" make no sense - as long as his competition is above mediocre, he will continue to fight the same style.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by tito yuca View Post
                This is bull****, if he looks better it's because they were against even bigger bums than those he fights now. Tyson KOd bums and past-their-prime fighters in the first round for the first 5 years of his career. Did he do this to the top dogs in the division when he finally stepped up the level of his competition? **** NO. Bottom line - it's easy to look good against ****ty fighters, and saying "look at his past fights" make no sense - as long as his competition is above mediocre, he will continue to fight the same style.
                There's a reason the fights Hatton has looked the worst in have been against his best opponents...

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by robjr View Post
                  An intelligent reply from an intelligent man.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Lmao@ these fighters being "shot". These lame excuses need to stop.

                    Kostya Tszyu just came from pwning Sharmba Mitchell before gettin beat by Hatton.

                    Castillo looked mighty healthy after fighting Corrales. He visibly DID look ****ed up on the fight wit Hatton. Still, Hatton is a way better fighter than Castillo. Hatton is also a way better fighter than Collazo, and I do believe he didn't know what he was gettin into when goin up to welterweight. I say he goes up again, get a rematch wit Collazo to set the record straight just like Mayweather with Castillo.

                    I say Hatton's "resume" and Mayweather's are neck and neck since Mayweather beat De La Hoya.
                    Last edited by NYCHeavyHitz; 07-11-2007, 01:43 PM. Reason: wanted to add something

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      it's a good resume at championship level, nothing more nothing less, Tszyu, Castillo were great wins. Don't go over the top either way, its good and he has the time to improve it further maybe into a great record if he beats Mayweather, Cotto. Easier said then done.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP