Is $iN the worst spammer in the history of NSB?

[Welter_Skelter]

$iN Aint so bad.. It's just that he is ****ing relentless.. I dont know how many WAYS you can BIG UP Floyd or Shoot down White Fighters in general.. and UK fighters in particular.. BUT $iN is detrmined to find the ALL...

It gets ****ing BORING real QUICK...

[mick66]

$in is OK..

I'm a Hatton nut Hugger....
and he don't piss me off....

He's so full of bull...it's mildly amusing..

[-EX-]

Stop hating on Mayweather and $in may take a rest...

[TRUE WARRIOR]

Stop hating on Mayweather and $in may take a rest...

maybe when mayweather stops being a coward and a businessman and starts to act like a real fighter does then people will stop hating.

[McNulty]

$in's threads have changed this board, all of the discussion is hatton vs Mayweather, and most of it is bull****.

I totally agree. So sick of seeing the same Hatton...PBF...thread...got old fast.

Not just that but like 50 different threads on the same topic. Come on guys...when is enuff enuff.

[Steelhammer86]

The site would be better off without the haters - such as $iN, McNulty, and DiegoFuego - because they distract from good, intelligent boxing discussions. They lack the capacity to be objective and fair, and their agenda is a nasty but simple one: to discredit some successful boxer(s).

We have a few British boxer haters, East European boxer haters, foreign boxer haters and Mayweather haters here. They comprise only a they small percentage of our membership although they sometimes seem more numerous. The quality of our discussions would be much better without them.

Right after the Klitschko fight tomorrow, several of the haters will discredit Wlad's KO win by posting:
1)Brewster is a shot fighter
2)Brewster was just there for the money
4)Brewster's year off had him out of shape or
3)Brewster took a dive.

Haters are very predictable...

[DiegoFuego]

The site would be better off without the haters - such as $iN, McNulty, and DiegoFuego - because they distract from good, intelligent boxing discussions. They lack the capacity to be objective and fair, and their agenda is a nasty but simple one: to discredit some successful boxer(s).

We have a few white fighter haters, British boxer haters, East European boxer haters, foreign boxer haters and Mayweather haters here. They comprise only a they small percentage of our membership although they sometimes seem more numerous. The quality of our discussions would be much better without them.

Right after the Klitschko fight tomorrow, several of the haters will discredit Wlad's KO win by posting:
1)Brewster is a shot fighter
2)Brewster was just there for the money
4)Brewster's year off had him out of shape or
3)Brewster took a dive.

Haters are very predictable...

This coming from the guy who said Wladimir Klitschko has a better resume than Roy Jones Jr. and that Ricky Hatton has a better resume than Floyd Mayweather because he has more knockouts.

You call everyone a racist, yet I've never heard of you supporting a non-white fighter. You just happened to call us racist first, so it makes you look clean. I at least like fighters of different backgrounds.

[CoLd_WaVE]

This coming from the guy who said Wladimir Klitschko has a better resume than Roy Jones Jr. and that Ricky Hatton has a better resume than Floyd Mayweather because he has more knockouts.

You call everyone a racist, yet I've never heard of you supporting a non-white fighter. You just happened to call us racist first, so it makes you look clean. I at least like fighters of different backgrounds.

Diego is a Pacfan...

[Steelhammer86]

I at least like fighters of different backgrounds.

All five fighters on my signature are from different backgrounds - in fact from different countries and different continents - than myself. I judge boxers on their merits, I don't hate on any fighter, and I never discredit anyone.

My statement about Hatton deserving a bigger share of the purse is my opinion as a Hatton fan, I'm entitled to it. Your putting a quote from me on your signature makes you seem ridiculous, but I like it being there because I want people to see it and think about it.

[Joartcc3]

It's a tough call. Juy compensates for his spam at times, and some of the Eubank interviews were worth reading. In theory posting interviews from the eighties by a realtively obscure British middleweight is worse, but in fact I think $iN's threads have a more negative overall effect.

JuyJuy was a good poster. He makes me laugh just about everytime.

Sin.... well he lacks consistency and logical strength in his arguments. It's like saying "my gun can blow up your tank" and even though his arguments are so horrific he still insists upon them.

And I am of the opinion that Sin should not be banned. He has a tendency to magnify the ******ity of a point especially when it comes to Fake fighters like PBF.