You’ve made some decent points but in fairness you can look at previous fights, KO ratio’s etc and pretty much come up with any conclusion that suits your opinion of a given fighter. For instance if you take into account how much better Ricky fights when he’s trained properley, compared to the 6 weeks he had to reach welter before Collazo, you could just as easily argue it could’ve been a different fight. Infact it probably would’ve been very different, stamina was the biggest factor for me as far as the Collazo fight goes, and given more time to grow into the weight, he’d have been much fitter I’m sure.
As far as the old ‘hit & hold’ theory goes, I’m a huge Hatton fan, but there’s no getting away from it, he does employ this tactic, and he does it bloody well. Also, you can forget that ‘small ring’ comment. What Ricky does better than anyone and gets little credit for is cut the ring off, he’s always on top of you, working inside. I think Paulie Malignaggi’s a superb boxer, but in my opinion he wouldn’t be able to withstand the pressure Ricky can lump on, whether he got through the Cotto fight or not.
As far as the old ‘hit & hold’ theory goes, I’m a huge Hatton fan, but there’s no getting away from it, he does employ this tactic, and he does it bloody well. Also, you can forget that ‘small ring’ comment. What Ricky does better than anyone and gets little credit for is cut the ring off, he’s always on top of you, working inside. I think Paulie Malignaggi’s a superb boxer, but in my opinion he wouldn’t be able to withstand the pressure Ricky can lump on, whether he got through the Cotto fight or not.
Comment