A lot of times a fighter is lauded for having "skill," though it's not always clear this means anything at all. Another poster (Optimus Wolf) rightly pointed out in another thread that the word is often used on here as a substitute for speed and flash. In that case it's at the least a poor word choice, and more likely it also represents a terrible misunderstanding of some basic things about boxing. If, to use the example Wolf was discussing, Judah is more 'skilled' than Cotto, what could this possibly mean? Judah doesn't throw a better vareity of punches, doesn't throw them in a cleaner, more consistent fashion. Cotto beats him there. Judah doesn't set up his punches better, in fact as fast as his left is, he doesn't work it off his jab or right hook very well at all. What do people mean, then, if not simply he's FASTER?
For my part I think the word is at its best a vague abstraction that has little use in boxing discussions. At the very least you should specify what you mean by this (ways of setting punches up, timing them, throwing them at angles, defensive strategies [specific ones!]), which is rarely done.
NOTE: This thread is NOT about Cotto and Judah; that was just an example. If you disagree with what I said about the example please DO NOT make that the basis of your reply.
For my part I think the word is at its best a vague abstraction that has little use in boxing discussions. At the very least you should specify what you mean by this (ways of setting punches up, timing them, throwing them at angles, defensive strategies [specific ones!]), which is rarely done.
NOTE: This thread is NOT about Cotto and Judah; that was just an example. If you disagree with what I said about the example please DO NOT make that the basis of your reply.
Comment