Eubank or Calzaghe?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
He'll have beaten everyone of note save Ottke over a ten year period. What did Jones really do at 68 besides Toney? Watson's best stuff was at 60 and Toney had Barkley. Perhaps the word should be 'greatest.' A win over Kessler would make Calzaghe the standard, the divisions first truly great champion as opposed to just fighter.Comment
-
Oh, I see. In terms of longevity and greatness and stuff.
(Watson's best work, by far was at 168 in one single, tragic fight/night)Comment
-
I would have to agree with you. Toney and Jones had other good wins there, Toney beating Charles Williams and Tim Littles, Jones beating Sugar Boy Malinga and another notable fighter I can't think of, but neither made a lasting impact like Calzaghe has.He'll have beaten everyone of note save Ottke over a ten year period. What did Jones really do at 68 besides Toney? Watson's best stuff was at 60 and Toney had Barkley. Perhaps the word should be 'greatest.' A win over Kessler would make Calzaghe the standard, the divisions first truly great champion as opposed to just fighter.
Kessler is a legitimate risk. Although I wish this fight was being held in a neutral territory, it'll be a great win for either guy no matter how you slice it.Comment
-
Eubank.
He has a better resume, was upfront.
Joe just plods along screaming about his legacy instead of taking it.Comment
-
Comment