Is the IBO Belt the most credible?!?

[OptimusWolf]

Is the IBO belt the most meaningful formal strap now?? (n inc the ring title)

I notice that the IBO seems to want the best fighter in each weightclass to hold the belt and don't strip their fighter at the first available opportunity. Wlad-Peter contested the IBO belt, Hopkins-Tarver, and now Castillo-Hatton.

It seems like the IBO are making good moves when organisations such as the IBF and WBC are making almighty **** ups at every turn. I don't hear as much crap from the WBA chiefs so I'll cut them some slack, and the WBO is the least important of the main belts so noone really cares what they do.

[No1]

I dont think it's the best but i think its the least corrupt ans actually gives the belt tothe best fighters unlike the others who give it to any fighter.

[Welter_Skelter]

For now They seem to be the most Honourable... BUT I wonder how many "lost" Duffel bags of Don Kings money it would take to change that.. should they become a major Player..????

[squealpiggy]

I dont think it's the best but i think its the least corrupt ans actually gives the belt tothe best fighters unlike the others who give it to any fighter.

Once they become established the belts should be available to any fighter that beats the holder in a title fight...

The IBO has the best rules, but rules can be changed or broken. Let's wait and see.