It seems after a little bit of scattered debate on the issue of the low blows that the people who have made an issue of them had Judah to win predominately.
It also seems like the folks who had Cotto to win think Judah was either acting, or not injured enough that the fouls caused any bearing on the outcome.
Nobody is being small minded about this are they?
It also seems like the folks who had Cotto to win think Judah was either acting, or not injured enough that the fouls caused any bearing on the outcome.
Nobody is being small minded about this are they?

Comment