"From Pillar to Post" - No Quit in Zab Judah

[Addison]

Nah Cotto's cool. He signed my ticket after the fight and I talked with Miguel Diaz for a while. My objectivity is not pathetic, your ideaology is pathetic, and I think Ryan can speak for himself he doesnt need you. I disagree with the article, cant expect everyone to agree with you all the time. Esepcially if he wants to be a writer, not everyone is going to love and agree with every article.

Sure call me a fan boy I dont care. Cotto made me one proud motha***a on Saturday and he never lets me down. He is my idol and he never disapoints his fans or his people. Im a huge fan of his,and to top it off hes a nice guy. Calling me a fan boy doesnt bother me, because im a huge fan of his.

Well.. Since you put it like that I mind a little bit less.

It sounds like you truly love Miguel - that is something I support 100%.

We need more people who are passionate about the sport and the fighters.

[Gato2012]

Well.. Since you put it like that I mind a little bit less.

It sounds like you truly love Miguel - that is something I support 100%.

We need more people who are passionate about the sport and the fighters.

Lol i wouldnt say i "love him" but im a huge fan. He makes me very proud every time he fights. He comes to fight, not pusy-foot around, he is always exciting and always wins. Hes a nice guy. Hes my idol/hero and does a great job representing his people and is good for the sport of boxing.

[Addison]

Lol i wouldnt say i "love him" but im a huge fan. He makes me very proud every time he fights. He comes to fight, not pusy-foot around, he is always exciting and always wins. Hes a nice guy. Hes my idol/hero and does a great job representing his people and is good for the sport of boxing.

What's wrong with loving another man?


But I hear you.

[Left2body]

What's wrong with loving another man?


But I hear you.

Addison since your still harping about Cotto intentionally low blowing Judah because he was hurt I'll pose the same question I gave you prior which you NEVER answered.

Where the hell in the 3rd round was Cotto sooo hurt that he needed to low blow Judah to get a momement of respite to collect himself?

[Addison]

Addison since your still harping about Cotto intentionally low blowing Judah because he was hurt I'll pose the same question I gave you prior which you NEVER answered.

Where the hell in the 3rd round was Cotto sooo hurt that he needed to low blow Judah to get a momement of respite to collect himself?

You are attaching the "hurt" thing into this.


Watch that low blow again about 500 times and tell me how bad it was..


Maybe Judah said "**** your mother" to Cotto before he did that.

Who knows.. But it looked pretty ****ing terrible, didn't it?............

That DID NOT HELP Judah.. It helped Miguel Cotto.


What a happy coincidence that was..

[Left2body]

You are attaching the "hurt" thing into this.


Watch that low blow again about 500 times and tell me how bad it was..


Maybe Judah said "**** your mother" to Cotto before he did that.

Who knows.. But it looked pretty ****ing terrible, didn't it?............

That DID NOT HELP Judah.. It helped Miguel Cotto.


What a happy coincidence that was..

I'm only attacking YOUR initial claim. This is what YOU said not me.

Then how the **** are you going to tell me the first low blow didn't come IMMEDIATELY on the heels of Judah hurting Cotto swarming him?

Judah was still ALL OVER Cotto when Miguel landed the low blow.

He couldn't get Zab off him until he threw it!

You still havent answered the question because Cotto wasn't hurt in the 3rd round when he unintentionally landed a low blow.

[Addison]

I'm only attacking YOUR initial claim. This is what YOU said not me.




You still havent answered the question because Cotto wasn't hurt in the 3rd round when he unintentionally landed a low blow.

You are so full of ****..

The whole basis for the argument is the first low blow and has been.


You saying that fighters ONLY throw low blows when they're hurt??????

.......That's the only time and reason for every occurance in the history of combat sports for fighters throwing low blows?


Posting quotes and pictures that have nothing to do with the argument don't win arguments - intelligence does. And you were beaten by me already.

Handily.

[freedom213]

The funniest email I've received on this piece LOL:

"You're an ******* to write that Cotto "intentionally" hit Zab low."

I got

I agree. It is a bit "assholish" to throw the intentional in your article about the low blows. Not that isnt a possibility but highly unlikely. Cotto is not that type of fighter but he is the type of fighter who throws a lot of body punches and guess what, it happens. So instead of using your article to get your little jab in there so you feel better about Zab's loss maybe we should refocus on how these type of fights must continue for boxing to become mainstream in the US again,of course along with several dozen other changes.

[jamesbrown]

Bull****!!!! The first "low Blow" was not even a "low blow". Even the blacks at the arena were calling his bluff. The 2nd one was definitely a low blow. Intentional? Who knows but I doubt it because cotto didn't need to do that in order to win.

it wasn't low??? what was it then plz do tell...

[Left2body]

You are so full of ****..

The whole basis for the argument is the first low blow and has been.


You saying that fighters ONLY throw low blows when they're hurt??????

.......That's the only time and reason for every occurance in the history of combat sports for fighters throwing low blows?


Posting quotes and pictures that have nothing to do with the argument don't win arguments - intelligence does. And you were beaten by me already.
Handily.

ROFL........pictures and quotes dont matter. What should we use to debate then an oracle or a magic eight ball?

The quote clearly shows your your hypocrisy.

First its quote low blowed because he was hurt and needed to recover. Then I point out he wasn't hurt in at least 1 of the occasions probably both.

Now your saying he intentionally low blowed for its own sake.

Funny thing is you get mad when I quote YOU and point out your contraditions in argument.

Of course you think you won an argument if you consider me quoting you ******.

Of course you think you won an argument when you change the premiss of a debate from reason or logic and use what you FEEL was done.


Please dont even reply to this as quotes and what we say clearly has nothing to do with the arguement.