oh yeah eubank did fight in the usa. his first five pro fights against people with a combined 1 win between them and the reason he did that was so later he could say he fought in the usa even though he never had a meaningful fight in the usa so ****** people like you could say hey look he fought there. next?
Calzaghe not great: Eubank
Collapse
-
Good point actuallyoh yeah eubank did fight in the usa. his first five pro fights against people with a combined 1 win between them and the reason he did that was so later he could say he fought in the usa even though he never had a meaningful fight in the usa so ****** people like you could say hey look he fought there. next?Comment
-
-
-
Comment
-
Don't agree with you have to lose to be considered great, someone people are just better than EVERYONE they have stepped into the ring with. That being said coming back from a loss DOES say alot about a fighter.Comment
-
Brighton bombast. He manages to hedge his bets and play both sides of the fence quite well.
It's true we don't know what to make of Calzaghe historically, but next week will be a pretty good indication of how we view his entire body of work.
I doubt people will forget his numerous title defenses in toto.
He's hall of fame, end of story. No, if's and buts. There will always be woulda,coulda, shoulda's..Comment
Comment