Good boxers would school Hamed as Barrera showed, but Manny is a fighter which would give Hamed a chance. Plus it would have made for a very exciting fight between the two. I think Manny could take punches from Hamed and his pressure would be too much for the Prince. I would say KO 7 for Pac.
Manny Pacquiao or pince naseem ?
Collapse
-
-
I laugh my bollocks off when i read that Barrera destroyed Naz
He didnt Destroy him at all He skooled him theres a big difference..
Great Matchup pac/Naz
Both are big punches Naz the bigger to me..
Manny has zero defense when his attacking and gets caught more so then Hamed..
Hamed early KOComment
-
early KO? lol. pac has been thru em/mab/jmm and none of them ever put down pac so where r u basing that? and this is given your presumption that he 'has zero defense' haha. sure you could say naz was a bigger puncher, and thats debatable, but i think his defense is null also, his hands are always down and he'll get easily tagged by pac.Last edited by Randall_Hopkirk; 06-07-2007, 12:37 PM.Comment
-
Hamed Is One Of The Most Skilled Fighters Ever.. Pac Would Get Caught.. Hamed Wasnt Just Based On Reflexes Hes The Only Fighter That Could Do Everything Left Handed Right Handed Work Of His Long Powerful Jab.. Hamad Punches Too Hard And Fast For PacComment
-
Good boxers would school Hamed as Barrera showed, but Manny is a fighter which would give Hamed a chance. Plus it would have made for a very exciting fight between the two. I think Manny could take punches from Hamed and his pressure would be too much for the Prince. I would say KO 7 for Pac.Comment
-
I would say each guy would win 5 out of 10... Paquiao would NOT be able to walk through Hamed's punches.. An Hamed Would not always be able to keep Paquiao off of him.. Very interesting match up stylisticly..Comment
-
this fight is not even debateable
a prime naz (95-97) ktfo pac every say of the week twice on sunday , dont get me wrong pacs a very good fighter but naseem was too fast and too explosive pac wouldnt get out of the first 3 roundsComment
-
Comment
-
not debatable? how ****** it is debatable thats why it would of been a legendary fight...fights that are not debatable like a barrera vs fana are stuff that dont make for a good fight.
its a 50/50 fight man...prince had the one punch power and awkard shots he could knock you out with 1 punch from anyh angle...but pacman had the blazing speed and combos and prinze hands are down for that legendary straight left off the double jab from pac...pacman also beat and faced some of the best technicians out there and they hid prince naseem from morales, barrera, and marquez for a long time because of this...and when he face barrera he couldnt do anything.
Its a toss up fight and if it happend probally would of been the biggest fight in the history of the featherweight division! probally would of made both fighters 10 million each and did at least 500k ppv buys.Comment
Comment