Who gives a **** about briggs. Like people are saying that maskaev/peter should be ppv. I'm glad that we get the better fights for free. From what people are saying now Maskaev/Peter is just regular hbo, thank god if thats true. I'm glad we get good fights for free instead of paying. I wish all the crap like briggs went on ppv.
Why do people complain when crappy fights like Briggs go on ppv?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Comment
-
-
I can see the argument "If you don't like it, don't pay for it, just don't complain about it." But it is comical that you're asked to pay $30 for a fight between two fringe contenders. It might be a fun fight, but in an ESPN2 kind of way, not where you should plan a fight party around (though sadly, the latter is how I will be spending the night/my birthday)Comment
-
I think there is probably space for maybe 4 ppv fights per year, and these should be huge fights.Comment
-
Why? Because I want to watch the fight and I'm going to watch the fight but the PPV makes it an extra hassleComment
-
LOL, I actually understand your logic here.Who gives a **** about briggs. Like people are saying that maskaev/peter should be ppv. I'm glad that we get the better fights for free. From what people are saying now Maskaev/Peter is just regular hbo, thank god if thats true. I'm glad we get good fights for free instead of paying. I wish all the crap like briggs went on ppv.Comment
Comment