Boxing's Version of The Final Four

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Boxing's Version of The Final Four

    By Jake Donovan - It works out well in every other sport. You stage a bracket system where the Final Four becomes the Final two. The winners of the semi-finals face off in the Finals, with the last team standing crowned champion of its sport. Furthermore, those who tuned in to the semifinals now await with anticipation the grand finale.

    You would like to believe that such a formula is in place when a televised boxing doubleheader consists of a champion in one bout, and his top two contestants fighting a title eliminator in the co-feature. It also makes perfect sense to follow through while people are still buzzing about the challenger who prevailed in an incredible co-feature, and how he would prove to be the perfect foil to a champion in dire need of a watchable and controversy-free fight.

    This being boxing, post-fight talks amongst the powers that be have naturally become about anything other than a Jermain Taylor-Kelly Pavlik bout happening any time soon.

    The one positive thing everyone in boxing seems to agree on after this weekend is that Kelly Pavlik is the top threat to the middleweight throne. He literally beat it into Edison Miranda in their seven-round war of a co-feature, thus permanently putting to rest the perception that he was just another chinny Midwestern slugger. [details]
  • THEBADBOY BG
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 1275
    • 58
    • 0
    • 1,450

    #2
    Thats how it should be,the best have to fight eachother.

    Comment

    • demirturk
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 2085
      • 248
      • 48
      • 8,729

      #3
      Originally posted by THEBADBOY BG
      Thats how it should be,the best have to fight eachother.
      yeah ! , but i don't see it happening , there should be a rule you can go up in weight , when you become undiputed champ, and then all the titles vacate.

      jermain is pissing me off ! , why the **** does he act like this , he was so humble pre-hopkins.... no hes acting like a douchebag

      Comment

      • THEBADBOY BG
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 1275
        • 58
        • 0
        • 1,450

        #4
        Originally posted by demirturk
        yeah ! , but i don't see it happening , there should be a rule you can go up in weight , when you become undiputed champ, and then all the titles vacate.

        jermain is pissing me off ! , why the **** does he act like this , he was so humble pre-hopkins.... no hes acting like a douchebag
        Fighters from now are not like fighters from the sugarrayleonard era now they are scared losing there undefeated record so they just fight guys they know they can beat.

        Comment

        • bengidaro
          Contender
          • Apr 2007
          • 293
          • 17
          • 0
          • 7,199

          #5
          In a perfect world yea its a good idea for the best to fight the best but it would never work. A lot of these guys want to put some fluff in their records so they'll fight ****ty fighters. No one has the balls to fight good fighters every time or even every other time but you only become great by beating the greatest that's what guys like Calzghe don't understand.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP