Tweet
it doesn't seem necessary to me, because isn't a sanctioning body only supposed to sanction a fight, and not award title belts? I would think that he only title belt that should be noticed as the undisputed championship is the championship that's been around since the beginning, The Ring Championship belts. your thoughts?
-
-
Agreed, one belt per weight class, that would help the state of boxing. You would need to fight the best to be the best, not single out weaker champions with other belts just to call yourself champion -
I don't like it. I think if it ain't broke don't fix it. Some might say its broke but those people are wrong. It's not broken. But while on the topic of sanctioning bodies does anyone think there should be a national sanctioning body. It would make everything a helluva lot easier.Comment
-
bump.............Comment
-
i kind of agree with you, maybe their should be tournaments(winners stay in ,losers get knocked off, all fighters fight once a month so everyone gets a chance to fight the best in their division, to stay on the tournament you earn a certain amount of points based on wins(depending on Split decision win, Majority Decion win, Unanimous Decision win, more points for k.o wins to be on p4p you base it on k-os, quality of opponent, and at the end of the year, In December 1, the tournament begins the top 16 boxers of the year in a division get in a tournament that starts december. December 25th trophy for fighter of the year(And it should be televised as as a reality tv show on non cable networks for all to see, (their should be profile so the top 16 fighters can talk about what theyre about) the best fighters will get the recognition and a huge stash of cash,Last edited by Tha_Greatest; 05-22-2007, 12:48 PM.Comment
Comment