Better resume...Hopkins? Calzaghe?

**New Life 79** · 05-19-2007, 02:02 PM

Hopkins has right now the better resume, but then again Joe is "only" 35 years old, and it was about that time Hopkins started to get going hehe....

**-EX-** · 05-19-2007, 02:18 PM

B-Hop in my opinion.

**Steelhammer86** · 05-19-2007, 02:24 PM

Joe Calzaghe has a much better resume than Bernard Hopkins had at 35, but Hopkins has a better resume overall. Joe needs two or three more good wins.

**Technical_Skill** · 05-19-2007, 02:25 PM

B-Hop. not sure if you can dispute that.

**Mozza** · 05-19-2007, 02:59 PM

Hopkins has a better resume without question.

**The Noose** · 05-19-2007, 03:22 PM

Im thinking of the fights Hopkins won. Not just big names he fought and lost to.
Actually, i just rememberd Tito and Oscar. I guess those were big wins.....werent they?

**macman** · 05-19-2007, 08:32 PM

After Trinidad, Hopkins took the lead - Calzaghe's playing catch-up now.

If he beats Taylor & Kessler I'll call them even.

**THE REAL NINJA** · 05-19-2007, 09:51 PM

How are they even close ?

Better resume...Hopkins? Calzaghe?