Boxing Theories: The Best

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nautilus
    ...
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2004
    • 6083
    • 402
    • 761
    • 13,468

    #1

    Boxing Theories: The Best

    A thread has been started regarding theories that best predict the winner of a fight.

    Adopting an old joke, I think that the best theory has been designed by the Harvard physicists. They have spent a multi-million dollar grant from the National Science Foundation in order to develop a splendid model. This model can finally shed some light on the matter:

    The model consists of two spherical boxers (balls) fighting (hitting each other) in a vacuum. The spherical boxer (ball) with a higher mass always wins!
    Last edited by Nautilus; 10-15-2004, 10:16 PM.
  • urdaddyinAZ
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2004
    • 1003
    • 58
    • 13
    • 1,174

    #2
    Dude, I'm lost by this thread (although very interesting) but is that Tatu in your avatar?

    Comment

    • Nautilus
      ...
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2004
      • 6083
      • 402
      • 761
      • 13,468

      #3
      Originally posted by urdaddyinAZ
      Dude, I'm lost by this thread (although very interesting) but is that Tatu in your avatar?

      Tatu it is. Being lost is fine. I feel that most of the time.

      Comment

      • Fat Shamz
        Phatter than ya mumma!
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Oct 2004
        • 600
        • 107
        • 126
        • 7,042

        #4
        What are you talking about?

        Comment

        • tracylee
          B Scene's Julia Roberts
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2004
          • 8181
          • 588
          • 865
          • 16,433

          #5
          Originally posted by Nautilus
          A thread has been started regarding theories that best predict the winner of a fight.

          Adopting from another story, I think that the best theory has been designed by the MIT physicists. They have spent a multi-million dollar grant from the National Science Foundation in order to develop a remarkable model. This model can finally shed some light on the matter:

          The model consists of two spherical boxers fighting in a vacuum. The spherical boxer with a higher mc^2 always wins!
          As fascinating as it is (and it is) I'm sitting here feeling pretty ******.

          Comment

          • Sir_Jose
            El Guapo
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2003
            • 4935
            • 424
            • 383
            • 13,646

            #6
            Originally posted by tracylee
            As fascinating as it is (and it is) I'm sitting here feeling pretty ******.

            exactly

            im just sitting here thinking WTF

            Comment

            • Winter
              The Snowmaiden
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Sep 2004
              • 728
              • 158
              • 177
              • 7,500

              #7
              Listen carefully to everything Nautilus says. He is brilliant.

              Nautilus is asking what are the best theories of predicting the winner of a fight.

              He believes the best theory has been designed by MIT physicists. I think the best way to see who wins a fight is to ask a child. They have a very pure heart, and they will know and feel what will happen!

              Comment

              • Nautilus
                ...
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2004
                • 6083
                • 402
                • 761
                • 13,468

                #8
                Originally posted by tracylee
                As fascinating as it is (and it is) I'm sitting here feeling pretty ******.

                Too nerdy I guess.


                This was a remake of a joke about a model of a spherical horse winning a race in a vacuum.

                (The most useless model one can think of.)
                Last edited by Nautilus; 10-15-2004, 08:10 PM.

                Comment

                • BrooklynBomber
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2004
                  • 28365
                  • 1,563
                  • 1,541
                  • 44,979

                  #9
                  As fascinating as they are all these theories are useless in the real life. They are only made for the ideal settings of the fight(like you have to be sure that your phisical condition in round 1 should b on one expected level and condition in round 6 on another expected level, whch is impossible in sports of boxing) and don't include things like determination ot mental toughness or even luck( i dont mean lucky punches). So this theories are only made by very smart people that are very bored

                  Comment

                  • Nautilus
                    ...
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 6083
                    • 402
                    • 761
                    • 13,468

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Winter
                    Listen carefully to everything Nautilus says. He is brilliant.

                    Nautilus is asking what are the best theories of predicting the winner of a fight.

                    He believes the best theory has been designed by MIT physicists. I think the best way to see who wins a fight is to ask a child. They have a very pure heart, and they will know and feel what will happen!
                    Yes. Angels have nearly perfect forecasting record.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP