Boxing does need rivarlys like back during the hagler, leonard, duran, hearns, days beacuse right now we wont see another megafight like de la hoya mayweather in years to come. whats your take on this.
Does Boxing need rivarlys
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
-
-
-
-
Boxing doesn't Need Rivalries... IT needs a KING/TYRANT....
Someone who seems Unbeatable,
Kisses Babies/Talks Trash
and Knocks heads Off....
He's gotta be popular in and out of the ring.
People either Hate that or love it. But they VERY much enjoy seeing "The KING" or "TYRANT" Fight because of his status. Once you reach the "KING/TYRANT" status you can lose a fight or 2 and still be the ****in MAN.
I want to be more of a Tyrant.. If Mayweather possesed some more Power he would definately be a TYRANT. If De La Hoya would WIN the MEGA fights he's been in.. He would Definately be a KING..
LAST KING we Had was ALI I think... LAST TYRANT we had was TYSON. Everyone else were just good fighters that amazed us and entertained us.Comment
-
Thats why u got guys like Edison Miranda hunting people down,once hes champ,i think he'll brighten up alot of things
And we got Pacman-Marquez II,Barrera-Pacman II,Barrera-Marquez IIComment
Comment