Why did boxingscene edit out that part on...

**BIGPOPPAPUMP** · 05-03-2007, 01:56 PM

It was edited out when we received it. I think there was a sound issue on the answer.

**jack_the_rippuh** · 05-03-2007, 01:58 PM

Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP

It was edited out when we received it. I think there was a sound issue on the answer.

Oh ok.
Well since you have Hopkins in your avatar, assume his role and answer the question...

**$ LegenD $** · 05-03-2007, 02:09 PM

what was said?....

**Slotff** · 05-03-2007, 02:15 PM

Originally posted by living_legend

what was said?....

When you stay in that bird coop for too long eating all that bird****, it starts to get to your head.

Then the interviewer asks if he thinks that there is anyone RJJ can make a legit comeback against.

**$ LegenD $** · 05-03-2007, 02:17 PM

damn.....hopkins is a bad mofo

**-Antonio-** · 05-03-2007, 02:18 PM

He doesnt touch a prime Jones either way.

**-Hyperion-** · 05-03-2007, 02:30 PM

Originally posted by -Antonio-

He doesnt touch a prime Jones either way.

yep, prime rjj=untouchable

**me2007** · 05-03-2007, 03:09 PM

Why do all fighters' primes end when they lose?

If you are fighting at 100% and you lose, then you lost in your prime. Everyone seems to think when a fighter loses they are past their best just cos they lost.

I`m not saying Jones was in his prime, he was 35 after all and on the decline...but alot of **** is spoken about 'primes' ... especially relating to fighters like tyson and a few others.

**$ LegenD $** · 05-03-2007, 03:20 PM

was hopkins considered in his prime when he lost to jones?....my money would be on hop if a rematch ever comes about....

Why did boxingscene edit out that part on...