Getting "Exposed"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JAHamilton77
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 239
    • 31
    • 15
    • 306

    #11
    Only a fool would say Louis was exposed the man was up in age, and had faced great fighters and proven himself many times over before Marciano.

    As far as Lacy goes, he was exposed. People thought he was great, was going to beat Calzaghe, and all sorts of other things (including many experts). And he was "exposed" as not being all those things. Lacy's situation speaks perfectly to the definition of exposed.

    Comment

    • potatoes
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2006
      • 1891
      • 98
      • 0
      • 8,358

      #12
      Originally posted by JAHamilton77
      Only a fool would say Louis was exposed the man was up in age, and had faced great fighters and proven himself many times over before Marciano.

      As far as Lacy goes, he was exposed. People thought he was great, was going to beat Calzaghe, and all sorts of other things (including many experts). And he was "exposed" as not being all those things. Lacy's situation speaks perfectly to the definition of exposed.


      How could Calzaghe have "exposed" Lacy? I had already "exposed" him by pointing out his flaws and how Calzaghe could exploit them. "People who thought he was great" don't know a "great" boxer when they see one. Most of Lacy's opponents just stood in front of him and got hit. Most of Wladimir Klitschko's opponents just stand in front of him and get hit. Some people say he is a "great" boxer too. They will tell you that the reason Klitschko's opponents don't do what they need to do to win is because Klitschko prevents them in some way. That is just hogwash, but until he faces somebody who isn't afraid of him, we will just have to wait until he gets "exposed."

      Comment

      • EliteSoldier
        GOD
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 5008
        • 335
        • 21
        • 5,251

        #13
        The Klitschko's don't suck at all. They are probably in the best physical shape for a heavy weight can be in. The only thing you can come at them with is if you think they don't have the right mental state to stay champ. Other then that, if they do have a good mental state no ones beating either of them.

        Comment

        • Gareth Ivanovic
          Bale, Bale, Bale
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2007
          • 10113
          • 295
          • 597
          • 20,073

          #14
          To me the word "exposed" means that a fighter gets his weakness or weaknesses shown to everyone for the first time. All fighters have a weakness. Some are harder to figure out than others.

          Comment

          • satori555
            Banned
            • Jul 2006
            • 1249
            • 164
            • 0
            • 1,362

            #15
            oh **** potatoes exposed lacy before joe fought him why didnt you tell him man! why did you let him go out there and get his ass beat! **** you!!!!!!!!!!

            Comment

            • JAHamilton77
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Apr 2007
              • 239
              • 31
              • 15
              • 306

              #16
              Originally posted by satori555
              oh **** potatoes exposed lacy before joe fought him why didnt you tell him man! why did you let him go out there and get his ass beat! **** you!!!!!!!!!!
              Ex f'n actly

              Glad he is there to speak for all of boxing, but shame on him for not stopping all those betters from putting their hard earned money on Jeff and making a 50/50 fight.

              Hilarious how "he" exposed Jeff before Joe did, guess since Lacy was a bum before Joe fought him, we can take Joe out of any P4P lists, since thats the fight many base him being there on.

              Comment

              • kayjay
                A ***** and I'm happy
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 13652
                • 1,813
                • 5,770
                • 30,799

                #17
                What about 'expwned', is it okay to use that?

                Comment

                • Crazy Dude
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 644
                  • 24
                  • 52
                  • 7,083

                  #18
                  You could say Syd Vanderpool exposed Lacy's weaknesses though not everyone noticed. When Calzaghe fought Lacy everyone noticed!

                  Comment

                  • Njord777
                    Archaic Pugilist
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 2509
                    • 177
                    • 9
                    • 8,928

                    #19
                    The nature of the game has changed. Boxers once fought- even at the peak of their careers- many times a year. It's why Sugar Ray Robinson has a record of almost 200 professional career wins. A boxer would routinely fight twice, maybe three times a month at one point.

                    What did a loss mean, then? If you were to get beaten and come back with a big victory the next week. Now boxers may fight 50 times in their entire career. Undefeated records are as common as venereal diseases. A fighter may only fight once a year- and if that one fight is a loss- well then, that year just became a waste in the history books.

                    You are "exposed" when you lose because in boxing today that might be the end of your career. I know it sounds insane but look at Floyd Mayweather. Most of his appeal is the air of invincibility his skills, and undefeated record, accord him. If he gets knocked out by De la Hoya do you think he'll be as respected? Or will his stock fall like Enron's in the boxing world?

                    In today's sport boxers fight so much less that one or two losses make us view the fighter in a totally different light. It can change the way they are approached and their entire careers. The term is thrown around simply to justify the way people jump on and off the bandwagon of some boxers as their popularity rises and falls.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP