If you're gonna debate these things properly then stop talking about "he looked beat up at the end" or such things and concentrate on scoring each round. If someone has been robbed it is because rounds that they clearly won were given to the other guy. See Lewis-Holyfield for an example of this.
I've consistently read guys with 1000+posts on a boxing website talk about "he needed to do more to take the belt from the champion" about fights like Taylor-Hopkins or Collazo-Hatton. WTF does that mean?
Sorry for the rant, but maybe if we debated the actual contentious rounds as they are what makes scoring, we might get somewhere.
I've consistently read guys with 1000+posts on a boxing website talk about "he needed to do more to take the belt from the champion" about fights like Taylor-Hopkins or Collazo-Hatton. WTF does that mean?
Sorry for the rant, but maybe if we debated the actual contentious rounds as they are what makes scoring, we might get somewhere.
Comment