manny pacquiao is very flawed skillwise

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kadyo's
    Grand Son
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2004
    • 23628
    • 2,648
    • 3,802
    • 56,474

    #11
    Originally posted by flipside
    isnt it supposed to be "e******o"? you could've just said ****** you know.
    that's because he has skills but no talento

    Comment

    • CoLd_WaVE
      Resurrected
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2006
      • 1066
      • 299
      • 585
      • 9,121

      #12
      Originally posted by CoLd_WaVE
      L O L... are Pac's superior punching power and speed not skills? look up the definition of skill before you talk outta your ass fatso... it's pac's technique that is flawed...
      Originally posted by Mistadobalina
      no. that's talent. ******o.
      Here's from wikipedia smartass...

      A skill is an ability, usually learned and acquired through training, to perform actions which achieve desired outcome.

      now tell me if superior punching power and speed are not skills???

      __________________________________________________ _______________

      stu·pid (stū'pĭd, styū'-)
      adj., -er, -est.

      Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
      Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
      Marked by a lack of intelligence or care

      Now this would be you^^

      Comment

      • HitBattousai
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Aug 2005
        • 402
        • 56
        • 2
        • 6,902

        #13
        Pac is not the most technically sound fighter. He jumps in with punches a lot, doesn't always keep his hands up, and sometimes gets a little too reliant on his excellent straight left. That said, it's hard to convert these errors into a win against him because:

        He's very fast, and has a good amount of head movement.

        His power makes it so the opposition fears that whenever he jumps in with punches, and generally they opt for defense rather than aiming to counter.

        His handspeed is great, and his style is something you can't really train for all that easily.

        He has a pretty solid chin even when he's caught.

        Comment

        • Addison
          THE COLDEST
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 19097
          • 2,375
          • 4,510
          • 27,222

          #14
          Originally posted by HitBattousai
          Pac is not the most technically sound fighter. He jumps in with punches a lot, doesn't always keep his hands up, and sometimes gets a little too reliant on his excellent straight left. That said, it's hard to convert these errors into a win against him because:

          He's very fast, and has a good amount of head movement.

          His power makes it so the opposition fears that whenever he jumps in with punches, and generally they opt for defense rather than aiming to counter.

          His handspeed is great, and his style is something you can't really train for all that easily.

          He has a pretty solid chin even when he's caught.
          That's right.

          The greats he's fought are as gutsy as they come.

          But they still aren't above flinching and bracing for impact..

          He must hit really ****ing hard..

          Comment

          • Technical_Skill
            Into The Deep
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 5736
            • 523
            • 219
            • 12,694

            #15
            Originally posted by dino
            his kangroo style of fighting wont work against a good quick boxer, in the marquez fight, marquez was thrown off by the kangroo style the first 2 or 3 rounds once he got control of it, pacquiao couldnt do anything, the first time he fights somebody who's quick with a jab (barrera isnt quick, nor is morales) he will be exposed.
            Without a doubt, Pacquiao is nowhere near as skilled as Marquez,

            What pacman is, is incredibly fit, quick and his left hand is so dangerous, they really should show it after the watershed. lol.

            The Key to beating Pacman is to aviod that left hand, he throws it way too often, and he leads in with quick combos which leave him unbalanced.

            Marquez can easily outbox pacman if he fights at his best, but i dont think he can aviod the left hand for too long, Pacquaio is too powerful and too quick, and soon as he turns the fight into a brawl, cant see him losing.

            Comment

            • miron_lang
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2004
              • 4187
              • 1,389
              • 1,727
              • 18,862

              #16
              Originally posted by Technical_Skill
              Without a doubt, Pacquiao is nowhere near as skilled as Marquez,

              What pacman is, is incredibly fit, quick and his left hand is so dangerous, they really should show it after the watershed. lol.

              The Key to beating Pacman is to aviod that left hand, he throws it way too often, and he leads in with quick combos which leave him unbalanced.

              Marquez can easily outbox pacman if he fights at his best, but i dont think he can aviod the left hand for too long, Pacquaio is too powerful and too quick, and soon as he turns the fight into a brawl, cant see him losing.

              EKSAKTO!!!

              Comment

              • JOM'S
                MANILA ICE
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2004
                • 13036
                • 1,420
                • 1,381
                • 28,113

                #17
                nothing new here, we all know that Pac is a flawed fighter and his technique have a lot of holes ...

                but i think his power, speed, stamina, agression more than compensate for his weaknesses ...

                Comment

                • Joartcc3
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 1010
                  • 79
                  • 0
                  • 1,233

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Addison
                  That's right.

                  The greats he's fought are as gutsy as they come.

                  But they still aren't above flinching and bracing for impact..

                  He must hit really ****ing hard..
                  That's what I'm saying, technique is useless when PAC has the fastest hands and the most power in boxing. Add also the southpaw style. PAC can refute standard laws of boxing because he is so DAMN FAST and POWERFUL.

                  Comment

                  • CoLd_WaVE
                    Resurrected
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 1066
                    • 299
                    • 585
                    • 9,121

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Joartcc3
                    That's what I'm saying, technique is useless when PAC has the fastest hands and the most power in boxing. Add also the southpaw style. PAC can refute standard laws of boxing because he is so DAMN FAST and POWERFUL.
                    nuthugging at its finest....

                    Comment

                    • Joartcc3
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 1010
                      • 79
                      • 0
                      • 1,233

                      #20
                      Originally posted by CoLd_WaVE
                      nuthugging at its finest....
                      Nope. I do back it up with evidence.

                      You have your definitions screwed. I advise you to look for a dictionary.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP