did enzo use an illegal punch?

[Run]

ofcourse its an illegal punch im not saying its not...
but if you are ****** enough to do that its as much your faault as it is his...
there would have been no punch if he didnt try to suck his ****

In my opinion, blows the back of the head should be legal.

I was only pointing out that he did hit him in the back of the head, and hitting in the back of the head is illegal in boxing.

who's fault was who's is really up in the air, I see black and white.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[JakeNDaBox]

That still shot makes it appear as if it's an illegal shot. But Enzo was already in motion when Hobson dipped low. It started out aiming for his chin, or at least on the side of his head (ear shot). He even cuffed his hand in throwing his shot. If he were aiming for the back of his head, he'd have instead thrown a looping right hand.

[JakeNDaBox]

[IMG][/IMG]

if that doesn't work, here's the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6WincRlQa0

[FeelTheA-Force]

That still shot makes it appear as if it's an illegal shot. But Enzo was already in motion when Hobson dipped low. It started out aiming for his chin, or at least on the side of his head (ear shot). He even cuffed his hand in throwing his shot. If he were aiming for the back of his head, he'd have instead thrown a looping right hand.

this sounds crazy but we need an external referee like in cricket.. and hobson should have had time from that punch... allowing him to recover, therefore giving us a better fight.

[IrishGym]

No!

Hobson was OWNED!