True or False?

[Texasboy34]

I was discussing the DLH vs Floyd fight coming up with a coworker… anyways we get into who we think will win, and why. He said "I think DLH will win, because Floyd fought Tito as an amateur and lost to him a couple of times, and DLH out boxed Tito…" I'm sitting there adding up dates in my head, and I know Floyd went pro in 96. Tito went pro in like 90 or 91 right? I don’t think this is right, and I think he's just pulling **** out of his ass to try to justify why he's picking DLH to win the fight. Floyd would have been like 13 or something in 1990! Any of you know if he was right or if he may be confusing Tito with someone else who beat up PBF in the amateurs?

[Chipper]

Floyd was 17 in 1990

[Kball15]

i cant say for sure, but i HIGHLY doubt that TITO and FLOYD have ever been in the same ring together.

And if they did, it was when Mayweather was VERY young and it wouldnt make a difference at all in the fight.

And it doesnt matter who DLH outboxed, he wont be able to outbox MAYWEATHER.

And you can ask FORREST and MAYORGA about the Triangle theory never works

[Texasboy34]

Floyd was 17 in 1990

He was born in 1977 according to boxrec.com which would put him at 13 or 14 years old in 1990.

[eazy_mas]

i cant say for sure, but i HIGHLY doubt that TITO and FLOYD have ever been in the same ring together.

And if they did, it was when Mayweather was VERY young and it wouldnt make a difference at all in the fight.

And it doesnt matter who DLH outboxed, he wont be able to outbox MAYWEATHER.

And you can ask FORREST and MAYORGA about the Triangle theory never works

i remeber the older Tito used to throw many combo but then he change to one big left hook which fight did he changed his style?