Trainers who schould only have one fighter.

[moy22487]

I have always heard that lots of time its not a good idea for a fighter to have many trainers. Do you guys think trainers should not have many fighters?
There are trainers like roach and steward who have sevral fighters and know how to handle it, then you have a guy like mab trainer who only has one fighter.
Can you think of any trainers who should only have one fighter?

I think dan burmingham is one of those guys. He is a good trainner but I think haveing one super star in winky should be enough for him.

[Del Coqui]

I have always heard that lots of time its not a good idea for a fighter to have many trainers. Do you guys think trainers should not have many fighters?
There are trainers like roach and steward who have sevral fighters and know how to handle it, then you have a guy like mab trainer who only has one fighter.
Can you think of any trainers who should only have one fighter?

I think dan burmingham is one of those guys. He is a good trainner but I think haveing one super star in winky should be enough for him.

If the one trainer you have knows well your strenghts/weaknesses and also studies your opponents, that maybe a good thing to have only one trainer, if not, 4 eyes see better than 2. Also sometimes when you have two trainers they mix you up.

[moy22487]

If the one trainer you have knows well your strenghts/weaknesses and also studies your opponents, that maybe a good thing to have only one trainer, if not, 4 eyes see better than 2. Also sometimes when you have two trainers they mix you up.

If you have 2 trainners it would be best that they have worked 2gether before and know how to come to agreements before the break starts, and that way they don't fight each other instead of paying attention to their fighter