Urkal Ranked #8 by The Ring

**tito yuca** · 02-17-2007, 01:53 PM

Why the hell is Tony #1??!?!

Shane should be way higher than him, he comes from KOing a guy at 154 (Tony lost at 154) and beating a guy at 147 that is much better than anyone Tony has beaten at that weight.

**riza** · 02-17-2007, 02:19 PM

ring mag is bull****. tony, cintron and urkal should not even be in the top10.
*** ringmagazine

**Tong Po** · 02-17-2007, 02:22 PM

Originally posted by riza

ring mag is bull****. tony, cintron and urkal should not even be in the top10.
*** ringmagazine

The RING champions are usually correct, but that looks to be a ******ed ranking system they've got going.

**tito yuca** · 02-17-2007, 02:23 PM

Agree 100% with riza and Counterpunch

**PRboxingfan** · 02-18-2007, 04:09 PM

Can you find better welterweights than Cintron or Margarito? This is the list of top Welterweights.

The reason Shane is under Margo is because he's only had one WW fight in the last year and a half.

**!!! Beowulf !!!** · 02-18-2007, 04:50 PM

Urkal is a soft opponent for Cotto, a fight with Judah will be worth seeing though. Cotto has to win both fights convincingly to be honest.

**Mech.** · 02-18-2007, 05:00 PM

excluding Urkal,thats not a bad list or anything,but its funny that they have Urkal up there.

**Mech.** · 02-18-2007, 05:05 PM

But I guess if gatti can be up there....a guy who recently has been stopped 2x in welterwieght fights and has beaten onlyThomas Damgaard for that ranking then....what can you say?

**Kayo** · 02-18-2007, 05:53 PM

I really get the feeling that Cotto's fight with Urkal is going to be alot like the one with Gianluca Branco

Urkal Ranked #8 by The Ring