CompuBox Analysis - Shane Mosley vs. Luis Collazo

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    CompuBox Analysis - Shane Mosley vs. Luis Collazo

    It’s a match up of former welterweight champions as onetime WBC king "Sugar" Shane Mosley (43-4, 37 KO) will fight previous WBA champ Luis Collazo (27-2, 13 KO) Feb. 10 at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas for something called the "interim" WBA welterweight title.
    Collazo won the WBA belt on April 2, 2005 when he captured a split decision from Jose Antonio Rivera in Rivera’s back yard of Worchester, Mass. Though Collazo-Rivera wasn’t seen live in the United States, it still ranks as one of the best 147-pound title fights in the last quarter-century in terms of two-way action. The big difference in this fight was the southpaw Collazo’s hand and foot speed. He triggered his punches more quickly and Rivera seemed to be a step behind throughout. The numbers back up this assertion as Collazo outlanded Rivera in 10 of the 12 rounds, but the connect advantage was three or fewer in five of those rounds. Rivera did a good job inducing Collazo to move into his power hand as well as forcing a war in the trenches. But every time Rivera put on a surge, Collazo would immediately answer with an even better one to maintain the edge. The relatively light-hitting Collazo managed to stun Rivera in the sixth and eighth rounds to make his mathematical mountain even more difficult to surmount. [details]
  • Del Coqui
    SAN JUAN
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 5407
    • 136
    • 245
    • 12,286

    #2
    Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
    It’s a match up of former welterweight champions as onetime WBC king "Sugar" Shane Mosley (43-4, 37 KO) will fight previous WBA champ Luis Collazo (27-2, 13 KO) Feb. 10 at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas for something called the "interim" WBA welterweight title.
    Collazo won the WBA belt on April 2, 2005 when he captured a split decision from Jose Antonio Rivera in Rivera’s back yard of Worchester, Mass. Though Collazo-Rivera wasn’t seen live in the United States, it still ranks as one of the best 147-pound title fights in the last quarter-century in terms of two-way action. The big difference in this fight was the southpaw Collazo’s hand and foot speed. He triggered his punches more quickly and Rivera seemed to be a step behind throughout. The numbers back up this assertion as Collazo outlanded Rivera in 10 of the 12 rounds, but the connect advantage was three or fewer in five of those rounds. Rivera did a good job inducing Collazo to move into his power hand as well as forcing a war in the trenches. But every time Rivera put on a surge, Collazo would immediately answer with an even better one to maintain the edge. The relatively light-hitting Collazo managed to stun Rivera in the sixth and eighth rounds to make his mathematical mountain even more difficult to surmount. [details]
    Sholdn't it be WBC?
    Anyway, I think this is going to be a very good match up. Although both are very good fighters, Mosley hasn't seen this kind of opposition in a few years and Collazo's performances against Hatton and Cassiani have raised a few question marks. I'm thinking Collazo's gonna pull it off. I hope whoever wins this one takes on Cotto on June.

    Comment

    • PRboxingfan
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2004
      • 2670
      • 107
      • 59
      • 8,939

      #3
      Collazo was the WBA champ and remained highly ranked in that organization (#2 with no #1). Cotto was allowed to fight for the vacant title with Urkal, but Urkal stepped asside so Cotto could fight Quintana. Now that Cotto is fighting Urkal, the WBA can allow two other highly-ranked fighters to go for the "interim" title. The winner will be Cotto's mandatory should he beat Urkal in March though I'm sure he'll have one optional defense since he is fighting his mandatory now.

      Mosley, however, is unranked by the WBA at Welterweight and ranked #2 at Jr. Middleweight.
      Last edited by PRboxingfan; 02-08-2007, 07:10 AM.

      Comment

      • Del Coqui
        SAN JUAN
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2005
        • 5407
        • 136
        • 245
        • 12,286

        #4
        Originally posted by PRboxingfan
        Collazo was the WBA champ and remained highly ranked in that organization. Cotto was allowed to fight for the vacant title with Urkal, the #1 ranked foe, but Urkal stepped asside so Cotto could fight Quintana. Now that Cotto is fighting Urkal, the WBA can allow two other highly-ranked fighters to go for the "interim" title. The winner will be Cotto's mandatory should he beat Urkal in March though I'm sure he'll have one optional defense since he is fighting his mandatory now.
        If Collazo loses to Mosley then he'll lose his WBA ranking right? I thought they were fighting for PBF's vacated title.

        Comment

        • PRboxingfan
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2004
          • 2670
          • 107
          • 59
          • 8,939

          #5
          Hmmm, if it's for the WBC title (Mosley #1 and Collazo #2) that's cool, but if it's for the WBA mandatory (Mosley #2 at 154, Collazo #4 at 147) then it would be even better because the winner would challenge Cotto.

          It might be the only way to get a Mosley - Cotto fight.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP