Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Corrie Sanders stands Zero chance... Haters get a life

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Corrie Sanders stands Zero chance... Haters get a life

    seriously people, debating whether or not corrie sanders can or will defeat the klitschko is an idiotic waste of time for everyone involved...

    do some freakin research before you start typing out of your asses!


    look, everyone here says that corrie sanders was a big flat slob when he fought vitali and that was why he lost.....

    when he defeated wlad he was 37 years old and weighed 225 pounds

    when he got his ass kicked by vitali he weighed 235 pounds.....

    do the math, 10 pounds was all it took to change sanders from the best shape of his career to the worst shape of his career.... thats a fact

    now, since none of you guys bothered i guess its my great pleasure to inform you that in his previous bout the now 41-year old sanders weighed in against colin wilson at an absolutely astounding 258 3/4 pounds..

    hey, thats only 23.75 pounds more than when he fought vitali and looked like a fat tun of ****.... man this guy must be serious about this comeback....


    if you take corrie sanders as a serious threat to either klitschko then you are as dumb or dumber, and equally adept at ignoring the facts as a guy named george bush
    Last edited by Hitman932; 02-03-2007, 06:11 PM. Reason: typo on fight result

  • #2
    258.75 pounds, sorry to disappoint everyone pinning their hopes on corrie sanders getting rid of wladamir on the cheap

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Hitman932 View Post
      seriously people, debating whether or not corrie sanders can or will defeat the klitschko is an idiotic waste of time for everyone involved...

      do some freakin research before you start typing out of your asses!


      look, everyone here says that corrie sanders was a big flat slob when he fought vitali and that was why he lost.....

      when he defeated wlad he was 37 years old and weighed 225 pounds

      when he defeated vitali he weighed 235 pounds.....

      do the math, 10 pounds was all it took to change sanders from the best shape of his career to the worst shape of his career.... thats a fact

      now, since none of you guys bothered i guess its my great pleasure to inform you that in his previous bout the now 41-year old sanders weighed in against colin wilson at an absolutely astounding 258 3/4 pounds..

      hey, thats only 23.75 pounds more than when he fought vitali and looked like a fat tun of ****.... man this guy must be serious about this comeback....


      if you take corrie sanders as a serious threat to either klitschko then you are as dumb or dumber, and equally adept at ignoring the facts as a guy named george bush
      what the **** are you talking about idiot, he never defeated vitali..
      u dont know ****

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by realheavyhands View Post
        what the **** are you talking about idiot, he never defeated vitali..
        u dont know ****
        that was a typo dip****, you couldve figured it out for yourself and saved your sorry ass reply for someone else

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by realheavyhands View Post
          what the **** are you talking about idiot
          u dont know ****

          lol, this coming from the guy who calls a 41 year old 259 pound semi-retiredsanders "the most talented heavyweight out there"

          not to mention you said he should be a cruiserweight, lol, he is 6'4 225 in his best shape.... yet again showing that you are the one who truly doesent know ****

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Hitman932 View Post
            seriously people, debating whether or not corrie sanders can or will defeat the klitschko is an idiotic waste of time for everyone involved...

            do some freakin research before you start typing out of your asses!


            look, everyone here says that corrie sanders was a big flat slob when he fought vitali and that was why he lost.....

            when he defeated wlad he was 37 years old and weighed 225 pounds

            when he got his ass kicked by vitali he weighed 235 pounds.....

            do the math, 10 pounds was all it took to change sanders from the best shape of his career to the worst shape of his career.... thats a fact

            now, since none of you guys bothered i guess its my great pleasure to inform you that in his previous bout the now 41-year old sanders weighed in against colin wilson at an absolutely astounding 258 3/4 pounds..

            hey, thats only 23.75 pounds more than when he fought vitali and looked like a fat tun of ****.... man this guy must be serious about this comeback....


            if you take corrie sanders as a serious threat to either klitschko then you are as dumb or dumber, and equally adept at ignoring the facts as a guy named george bush
            What you typed may all be true as far as numbers, but saying that the ten pounds is why he lost is not a fact. Do your research and look up the word 'fallacy'

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by neils7147933 View Post
              What you typed may all be true as far as numbers, but saying that the ten pounds is why he lost is not a fact. Do your research and look up the word 'fallacy'
              i didnt say that was why he lost, just about everyone else did, which is what i stated, personally i just thought he wasnt good enough

              my point was the ten pounds was all it took to take him from excellent shape (against wlad) to bad shape (against vitali)

              merely trying to put into perspective how bad he will look with another 20 pounds of fat stacked on top of that
              Last edited by Hitman932; 02-03-2007, 08:20 PM. Reason: added info

              Comment


              • #8
                It doesn't really matter if Sanders can beat the Klitschko's or not. He did beat Wlad and he can do it again. All that matters though is if the fight is going to happen, because right now it's all pure speculation.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Legacy wise, Wladdy needs this fight as well as the Brewster rematch.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by darkstar777 View Post
                    It doesn't really matter if Sanders can beat the Klitschko's or not. He did beat Wlad and he can do it again. All that matters though is if the fight is going to happen, because right now it's all pure speculation.
                    it would be a long shot for sanders to win against wlad in this stage of there careers. I would have even favored wlad 4 years ago in a rematch. he just walked straight forward showing no respect and he got caught the first time. he didnt use his jab much,,,,didnt tie up on the inside,all he'd have to do is box the way he has his last 3 fights and sanders would tire and get taken out

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP