michael spinks appreciation thread

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brownpimp88
    Mike Tyson the Third
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 1552
    • 36
    • 1
    • 7,865

    #1

    michael spinks appreciation thread

    Michael Spinks: An Appreciation

    10.16.04 - By Frank Lotierzo - GlovedFist@Juno.com: He is one of the least appreciated all-time great fighters in fistic history, at any weight. This all time great champion's career accomplishments measure up favorably to any other fighter who ever held the same title. In fact Michael Spinks never lost once in the division he ruled as undisputed champion, and this was during a time when the division may have never been more loaded with top fighter's in it's history.

    Michael Spinks is the only undefeated light heavyweight champion in boxing history. Something that can't be said about Tommy Loughran, John Henry Lewis, Billy Conn, Archie Moore, Bob Foster, or Roy Jones. In 101 years of crowning light heavyweight champion's, only one of them never tasted defeat while weighing 175 pounds, Michael Spinks. Spinks was also the first reigning light heavyweight champion to challenge and defeat the reigning heavyweight champion. Something past greats Billy Conn, Archie Moore, and Bob Foster also attempted as light heavyweight champ, but failed to do.

    In one fight Spinks made history and defied history. The night Michael Spinks won a 15 round unanimous decision over Larry Holmes, Holmes was 48-0. On top of that he made 20 consecutive title defenses during his seven year reign as heavyweight champion, only Joe Louis made more with 25. On September 21st 1985, Larry Holmes was one win shy of matching the record of histories only undefeated heavyweight champion, Rocky Marciano, who retired 49-0. By virtue of his upset win over Larry Holmes, a fighter who weighed 50 pounds more than any fighter he ever fought, Michael Spinks added a page to light heavyweight history and preserved a page of heavyweight history.

    After defeating Holmes in a rematch, Spinks fought the once beaten Steffen Tangstad and knocked him out in the fourth round. Nine month's later Spinks took on the 6 '6" 238 lb Gerry Cooney, who's only loss was to undefeated heavyweight champion Larry Holmes. At the time, Cooney's punching power was thought to be as formidable as any heavyweight in the world, including Mike Tyson. In what could best be described as a five round clinic, Spinks stopped the favored Cooney. In his next fight Spinks fought Mike Tyson for the undisputed heavyweight championship of the world. Tyson who was in his prime was undefeated in 34 fights. In one round, Tyson did what no fighter ever did, beat Michael Spinks and knock him off his feet.

    In a career that spanned 12 years, Spinks fought 32 times winning all but his last fight. The last 16 fights of his career were all title fights in which he went 15-1, 11-0 at light heavyweight and 4-1 at heavyweight. He is also one of only six light heavyweight champs who never lost a Light Heavyweight title fight. Michael Spinks was never hurt or knocked off his feet while campaigning as a Light Heavyweight. It wasn't until the last fight of his career that Spinks was knocked down, and it took one of the greatest punchers in heavyweight history to accomplish it. Those are some of Michael Spinks monumental accomplishments.

    Spinks the fighter was complete and could do it all inside the ring. To compliment his talent and ability, Spinks had another advantage, his size. At 6' 2" Spinks was one of the biggest light heavyweight Champions in history. His fighting style is best described as being a boxer-puncher. He was a tremendous two handed puncher who could box and dictate with his jab and knew how to utilize his height and reach versus taller and shorter opponents. As he was forced to do in his Light Heavyweight unification bout with 5'' 7" WBC Champ Dwight Muhammad Qawi, and against the 6' 6" Gerry Cooney.

    Michael Spinks is one of only a handful of great fighters who had the ability to take out his opponent with three different punches, needing only one to do it. He is best known for his over hand right, dubbed "The Spinks Jinx". The Spinks "Jinx" was a life taker. However, Spinks knocked out two time light heavyweight champ Marvin Johnson with one devastating left uppercut. And his left hook was every bit as formidable and devastating as his uppercut.

    The word great is thrown around too freely today in my opinion. But in the case of former Light Heavyweight and Heavyweight champion Michael Spinks, it's the only word that accurately capsules his career. I haven't the slightest reservation saying Michael Spinks was not just a great fighter, he was an all time great fighter.

    Spinks wasn't flashy, and never ranted on about how great he was. He was always in top condition and never took an opponent light. Before and after his fight's he was always respectful of his opponent, but in the ring he was a killer. He showed no mercy on a hurt opponent and fought bell-to-bell every round. Spinks was also a ring technician who if he hadn't figured out his opponents weakness and vulnerabilities before the fight, it didn't take him long during the fight.

    The only negatives on Michael Spinks are, he wasn't flashy like Roy Jones, nor did he have a personality like Muhammad Ali that drew attention making it impossible for his accomplishments to be overlooked. What hurts the memory of Spinks, is losing his last fight to Mike Tyson in a convincing fashion, being stopped in one round.

    Boxing fans have very short memories. Spinks was never down or stopped in his career as Light Heavyweight Champion. It took an undefeated Heavyweight Champion in his prime, one of the best two handed punchers in Boxing history to do it in his last fight.

    Former Light Heavyweight Champ Roy Jones, the best Light Heavyweight champ since Spinks, was knocked out for the second straight time in his last fight by Glencoffee Johnson. Johnson was 8-9-2 in his last 19 fights, and 2-2-2 in his last 6. As a result of one Johnson right hand, a fighter not known as a big puncher, Jones was down for eight minutes. Today many writers and Boxing fans are willing to give him a pass based on his career accomplishments. Yet Michael Spinks is admonished by some for being knocked out by Mike Tyson in his prime? Go figure.

    The bottom line is Michael Spinks could fight. He was an outstanding boxer who had height, reach, and power. On top of that he was strong willed and tough and took a great punch. Michael Spinks could beat his opponent boxing, slugging, or counter-punching. He was effective being the aggressor, or he could be effective by stepping back and drawing his opponent into him. As a puncher, Spinks the Light Heavyweight had dynamite in both fist.

    When evaluating his career body of work, Michael Spinks is arguably the most accomplished Light Heavyweight Champion since the inception of the division in 1903. Evaluating Michael Spinks the fighter, other than looking awkward sometimes, he could do it all and had no weakness.

    Today, the media and fans shower fighters with pristine undefeated records with much high praise. Michael Spinks went undefeated fighting during the deepest era in Light Heavyweight history. And he beat the real heavyweight champion to win the title, who was also undefeated. Michael Spinks is the most accomplished light heavyweight champion in history.



    He is an all time great for god's sakes, give him his dues. Undefeated light heavyweight champ, he had to move up cuz he blew threw his division with ease. There was no one left for him to fight at 175, so he went up to heavyweight and got the most satisfying win in his career against the living legend of boxing, larry holmes.
  • The Surgeon
    Days Of Glory
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2006
    • 15385
    • 712
    • 1,578
    • 24,784

    #2
    Mike Spinks was a Hell of a Light heavy and a damn good Heavy!

    Comment

    • Jim_Davis
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2007
      • 3963
      • 1,782
      • 646
      • 5,757

      #3
      I know he was a great champion but when I hear his name I just think of him as one of those guys that Tyson pwned. Which is wrong cos I bet alot of people remember my fave fighter as the guy Barrera pwned.

      Comment

      • The Surgeon
        Days Of Glory
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2006
        • 15385
        • 712
        • 1,578
        • 24,784

        #4
        Originally posted by Naz-Fan
        I know he was a great champion but when I hear his name I just think of him as one of those guys that Tyson pwned. Which is wrong cos I bet alot of people remember my fave fighter as the guy Barrera pwned.
        Exactly! Unfair as **** but it happens!

        Comment

        • brownpimp88
          Mike Tyson the Third
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 1552
          • 36
          • 1
          • 7,865

          #5
          Dont worry, none of the light heavyweight champs would have beat a prime tyson. Guys like foster and moore lost to lesser heavyweights. Spinks is the ****in man.

          Comment

          • The Surgeon
            Days Of Glory
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2006
            • 15385
            • 712
            • 1,578
            • 24,784

            #6
            Doin what he did against even a faded version of The great Larry Holmes is enough to give him decent/good heavy credit. And at Light Heavy, Forget about it!

            Comment

            • brownpimp88
              Mike Tyson the Third
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2006
              • 1552
              • 36
              • 1
              • 7,865

              #7
              I know it pisses me off when they say, oh larry was old. Guess what, archie and bob foster would still have lost to him. Mike's style is the one that can beat heavyweights. By the way larry didnt become champ till he was 29 and he admitted that he aged well too. It's a HUGE win for spinks, nuff said. On top of that, he cleaned his division just liek duran cleaned the lightweight division.

              Comment

              • The Surgeon
                Days Of Glory
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2006
                • 15385
                • 712
                • 1,578
                • 24,784

                #8
                Originally posted by brownpimp88
                I know it pisses me off when they say, oh larry was old. Guess what, archie and bob foster would still have lost to him. Mike's style is the one that can beat heavyweights. By the way larry didnt become champ till he was 29 and he admitted that he aged well too. It's a HUGE win for spinks, nuff said. On top of that, he cleaned his division just liek duran cleaned the lightweight division.
                Great fighter no doubt about it. Its a shame that Nazfans right, he will mainly be remembered for being blown out of the water by an outstandind and Prime Mike Tyson.
                Just out of intrest how did u score the Holmes Fights?
                Dosent matter either way, he gave him fits!

                Comment

                • brownpimp88
                  Mike Tyson the Third
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 1552
                  • 36
                  • 1
                  • 7,865

                  #9
                  he won the first fight by 2 points, the 2nd one was controversial, it could have gone either way. I think they showed a bias towards michael cuz he was the smaller guy. It still makes michael look good cuz we know he was better at this weight than foster and archie were.

                  Comment

                  • The Surgeon
                    Days Of Glory
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 15385
                    • 712
                    • 1,578
                    • 24,784

                    #10
                    Originally posted by brownpimp88
                    he won the first fight by 2 points, the 2nd one was controversial, it could have gone either way. I think they showed a bias towards michael cuz he was the smaller guy. It still makes michael look good cuz we know he was better at this weight than foster and archie were.
                    I havent seen either fight in years and i didnt do a running score card as i do now but i remember having the impression both fights could hav gone either way. Larry was slightly on the slight but still the best and even a 90% Holmes kicks ass! **** a 65% Holmes would tear up the division 2day! He would toy with Peter JT Briggs ect, whip Valuev and he beats Wlad too, tho Wlad coz's him problems stylistically! Holmes is top 5 ATG Material for heavys. possibly higher!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP