NAZ vs JCC

[PATO 1]

chavez would murder him, naz was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to small for chavez

[chidave]

At his best, in his prime, with the best performance of his career, Chavez would still have been far too much for him. Hamed was a very good fighter, Chavez was a great fighter, and stylistically Chavez would be all wrong for Hamed.

[Jim_Davis]

make up your mind

Your an idiot. You make a topic like this but show you clearly have no intelligence by some of your replies.

[ferocity]

Those who say Naz could beat or even KO Chavez..I say **** off and get off Naz nuts!

Two fighters, i will point too and basicly its end of argument. Wayne McCullough and Cesar Soto. So Naz kissers, relax. Your boy was protected in Europe. Anybody can look good against lower caliber fighters but not anyone can look good against quailty fighters. Even before Naz hit Hbo he was on Showtime and besides his power, there was nothing special about him, what made Naz is his power. And even then he couldn't ko the granite McCullough and Soto, **** people felt he lost to Soto. Naz is over rated by his fanatics. When Barrera beat him, i was surprised, cause i felt Barrera was already past his best, yet he still was able to beat Naz. And what showing did he give after the Barrera fight? A worse showing that sent him back to retirement even though he won a decision. Chavez murders Naz.

[.Mik.]

Those who say Naz could beat or even KO Chavez..I say **** off and get off Naz nuts!

Why instead dont you say "You're wrong...I think that your biasy for Naz is clouding your judgement as Chavez' style would be custom made for defeating someone like Naz, as evidenced by his greater fight record etc"?

That way people might actually bother to read the rest of your post, instead of assuming that you're yet another one of those NSB morons who talks about nut-hugging, ducking fighers, protected fighters, haters and thinks that their opinion is always correct, instead of having credible boxing debates.

[ferocity]

Why instead dont you say "You're wrong...I think that your biasy for Naz is clouding your judgement as Chavez' style would be custom made for defeating someone like Naz, as evidenced by his greater fight record etc"?

That way people might actually bother to read the rest of your post, instead of assuming that you're yet another one of those NSB morons who talks about nut-hugging, ducking fighers, protected fighters, haters and thinks that their opinion is always correct, instead of having credible boxing debates.

Thats cause you're talkinag about a living legend in Chavez. Where as Naz quit/retired early rather then pick up the pieces and try again.

[.Mik.]

Thats cause you're talkinag about a living legend in Chavez. Where as Naz quit/retired early rather then pick up the pieces and try again.

Doesnt mean that you have to structure your argument like an idiot, does it?

People have their opinions, respectfully disagree with them and say why you disagree. Dont bother with the '**** off nut-hugger' bull****, otherwise why would anyone want to listen to what you have to say?

If anything, the fact that you know you are so blatantly right should make it easier for you to get people to listen to you and agree with you, rather than putting them off.

[ferocity]

Doesnt mean that you have to structure your argument like an idiot, does it?

People have their opinions, respectfully disagree with them and say why you disagree. Dont bother with the '**** off nut-hugger' bull****, otherwise why would anyone want to listen to what you have to say?

If anything, the fact that you know you are so blatantly right should make it easier for you to get people to listen to you and agree with you, rather than putting them off.

I apploigize, my bad, i shouldn't have came off like that. I just got a bit pissed off when people started talking ko or how Naz would beat Chavez. My bad you're right is just there opinions. I appoligize.

[.Mik.]

I apploigize, my bad, i shouldn't have came off like that. I just got a bit pissed off when people started talking ko or how Naz would beat Chavez. My bad you're right is just there opinions. I appoligize.

No worries. People just seem to get carried away at this place and it leads to thread after thread of seemingly intelligent people conversing like arrogant fools instead of using their intellect and knowledge to have reasonable and interesting debates. Its easy to get caught up in it.

[Hydro]

not only was chavez just a better fighter, but he also fought at higher weight classes, from 130 to 140.

hamed fought mostly at 126 and below.

chavez wins.