Sugar Shane Mosley vs. Luis Collazo?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • !! Anorak
    • Feb 2026
    • 4,530
    • 10,898
    • 0

    #1

    Sugar Shane Mosley vs. Luis Collazo?

    Not primes... NOW.

    It's been rumoured for February 10th. Who wins now?

    Note: factoring Hatton into the discussion if anyone was going to is pretty irrelevant as not only is triangular logic frequently meaningless, but the styles are completely different. Even if Shane is a better fighter than Hatton (and who knows if he is at this stage of his career? The Vargas results could easily be fools' gold) it does NOT automatically compute that he would beat Collazo.
    15
    Mosley KO
    53.33%
    8
    Mosley points
    33.33%
    5
    draw
    0.00%
    0
    Collazo points
    13.33%
    2
    Collazo KO
    0.00%
    0
    No pick
    0.00%
    0
    Last edited by Guest; 12-29-2006, 04:58 PM.
  • PATO 1
    ...........
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2006
    • 4994
    • 674
    • 88
    • 12,088

    #2
    mosley ko 11

    Comment

    • GEOFFHAYES
      Juy Hayes
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2006
      • 6547
      • 349
      • 7
      • 14,036

      #3
      Collazo was exposed abit against Hatton. He's simply not a world-class fighter on that performance. If you can't even beat a guy who literally can barely move on the night and who has admitted his body was failing him, then who can you beat?

      Comment

      • !! Anorak
        • Feb 2026
        • 4,530
        • 10,898
        • 0

        #4
        Originally posted by GEOFFHAYES
        Collazo was exposed abit against Hatton. He's simply not a world-class fighter on that performance. If you can't even beat a guy who literally can barely move on the night and who has admitted his body was failing him, then who can you beat?
        That's a fair point actually... he gets credit for looking good against Hatton, but he still lost and Hatton was ****.



        Nah, actually, on second thoughts Geoff you're talking bollocks.

        Comment

        • PATO 1
          ...........
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2006
          • 4994
          • 674
          • 88
          • 12,088

          #5
          bull****..

          Comment

          • kayjay
            A ***** and I'm happy
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2006
            • 13652
            • 1,813
            • 5,770
            • 30,799

            #6
            I picked Mosley by KO but I have no good reason to think Collazo will crack like that.

            Comment

            • GEOFFHAYES
              Juy Hayes
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 6547
              • 349
              • 7
              • 14,036

              #7
              Originally posted by !! Anorak
              That's a fair point actually... he gets credit for looking good against Hatton, but he still lost and Hatton was ****.



              Nah, actually, on second thoughts Geoff you're talking bollocks.
              You must be blind, no offense Adam.

              Collazo only looked good because Hatton was moving at like 0.5mph and weighing 165lbs on the night (on his naturally stumpy frame anyway). Kerry Kayes was exposed that night, as well.

              The buck is still out on Collazo. I thought he looked like a ***** against Hatton.

              Comment

              • PATO 1
                ...........
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2006
                • 4994
                • 674
                • 88
                • 12,088

                #8
                Originally posted by GEOFFHAYES
                You must be blind, no offense Adam.

                Collazo only looked good because Hatton was moving at like 0.5mph and weighing 165lbs on the night (on his naturally stumpy frame anyway). Kerry Kayes was exposed that night, as well.

                The buck is still out on Collazo. I thought he looked like a ***** against Hatton.
                you talk some of the ******est **** ive ever read on hatton

                Comment

                • GEOFFHAYES
                  Juy Hayes
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 6547
                  • 349
                  • 7
                  • 14,036

                  #9
                  Originally posted by El Temible
                  you talk some of the ******est **** ive ever read on hatton
                  Or how about the truth. ****ing hell, anybody with two working eyes could see that there were serious problems with Hatton's body in that ring, that he could barely even move (and yet Collazo couldn't even take advantage).

                  Comment

                  • clemente
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 581
                    • 8
                    • 0
                    • 7,002

                    #10
                    are u guys serious,
                    no one gave collazo even a shot at that fight. do you think he even had to take that fight, no.. he probably knew that hatton was way overrated. which he proved that night.
                    no one even knew who collazo was until that fight.
                    as a matter of fact of hatton didn't sign a 3 fight deal with hbo, he probably would of lost that fight..
                    so give collazo a break

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP