Based on the resume alone, i'd say Ottke.
But the close or even severely questionable decissions for Ottke (particularly towards the end of his career) probably tips the scales in Calzaghe's favour.
Still i think there's a tendency to underrate Ottke's abilities when he was in his prime, because of his (perceived boring) style and the dubious decissions.
I'm not convinced a prime Calzaghe would have beaten a prime Ottke. (Calzaghe perhaps 60-40 favourite on neutral grounds).
Based on the resume alone, i'd say Ottke.
But the close or even severely questionable decissions for Ottke (particularly towards the end of his career) probably tips the scales in Calzaghe's favour.
Still i think there's a tendency to underrate Ottke's abilities when he was in his prime, because of his (perceived boring) style and the dubious decissions.
I'm not convinced a prime Calzaghe would have beaten a prime Ottke. (Calzaghe perhaps 60-40 favourite on neutral grounds).
Ottke would have been stopped by Calzaghe. Ottke depended on speed and defence, but Calzaghe is/was faster than Ottke and definately stronger. He had the workrate to make him quit really.
Comment