Are people serious with this Valero kid?
Pacquiao has his limitations but Valero has NOTHING but a punch. And who has he knocked out except Mosquera?
In perspective, this is not to degrade Valero at all; if he beats Pacquiao, then great, but to even suggest him at this point when he has no semblance of technique or defense strikes me as very premature.
He's most effective when teeing off, and even then a lot of his shots are wide, wild, and often lunging punches that leave him wide open to counters.
Pacquiao is much more organized in comparison. He has constant lateral movement and has much more direction about his work in terms of landing and being set to land or be defensive if necessary.
Valero is exciting, but I just don't see how he he'd beat Pacquiao without landing some lucky ****.
Valero wouldn't beat Marquez if he had a ten round headstart.
Pacquiao has his limitations but Valero has NOTHING but a punch. And who has he knocked out except Mosquera?
In perspective, this is not to degrade Valero at all; if he beats Pacquiao, then great, but to even suggest him at this point when he has no semblance of technique or defense strikes me as very premature.
He's most effective when teeing off, and even then a lot of his shots are wide, wild, and often lunging punches that leave him wide open to counters.
Pacquiao is much more organized in comparison. He has constant lateral movement and has much more direction about his work in terms of landing and being set to land or be defensive if necessary.
Valero is exciting, but I just don't see how he he'd beat Pacquiao without landing some lucky ****.
Valero wouldn't beat Marquez if he had a ten round headstart.
Comment