Trilogy would you rate higher, Barreras or Pacs?

[Roberto_Roldan_]

Id say Barrera because they were 3 exiting battles , what u guyz think

[Alibata]

Id say Barrera because they were 3 exiting battles , what u guyz think

The Pac fights where more intense for me but the Barrera fights were more competitive through out the trilogy.

[SnoopySmurf]

Morales/Barrera II was underwhelming. Barrera chose to box and I thought Morales won that fight.

[DiegoFuego]

Morales-Barrera I = best fight of the 6
Morales-Barrera II = worst fight of the 6 (Morales was robbed)
Morales-Barrera III = Morales-Pacquiao I

only Morales-Pacquiao I was really competitive in the second trilogy. Morales losing by 3rd round KO pretty much kills their trilogy's chances of ever ranking up there with the great ones.

Morales-Barrera trilogy takes this in a landslide.

[Sttuddahboy619]

I'd say even...because MAB vs MoralesI &III were exciting.PAC Vs MoralesI&II were also exiciting.The third fight was cut way too short.

[Rudyo]

Morales- Barrera.

The first MAB- Morales fight was classic.

[Easy-E]

Morales v Barrera and its not close.
Two of the best fighters in the world, in their primes, who hate each other fighting 2 wars???!
Come on now.