Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[ADP02]

You were so BOLD here for 2 months.



What happened to your BALLs? Left them somewhere and cannot remember where?




I will send this guy over to your house to check if you still have any!!!!

Don't ever talk about someone having no balls when yours haven't descended yet, Junior.



Why did you NEVER answer ShoulderRoll when he asked you if you want a rematch, pvssy?

HOW THE FVVCK YOU GONNA CRY ABOUT LOSING 4-0 FOR OVER A YEAR, AND WHEN YOU GET OFFERED A REMATCH, YOU DECLINE

[B]

My balls are on your face bltch. But...

[/B

Lots Of Deflecting from the subject. We know that you like doing that.

You have 20+ BS excuses as to why you DUCKED!!! But that is you just saying QUACK!!!

I actually provided acceptable solutions for your Quackery!!! Even then, you just replying back with more quacks!!!!!



You are just trying to cover up the truth that,

You have no balls to accept the challenge.




As I said, there is only 1 reason to decline on something that you believe you were previously correct on.


You are a liar and cheat!!!!

[travestyny]

Lots Of Deflecting from the subject. We know that you like doing that.

You have 20+ BS excuses as to why you DUCKED!!! But that is you just saying QUACK!!!

I actually provided acceptable solutions for your Quackery!!! Even then, you just replying back with more quacks!!!!!



You are just trying to cover up the truth that,

You have no balls to accept the challenge.




As I said, there is only 1 reason to decline on something that you believe you were previously correct on.


You are a liar and cheat!!!!

No, you didn't provide any acceptable solutions. You are an outright liar. I sincerely feel sorry for you.

Let's take this back to the beginning.


This started out with you saying that Mayweather could reduce his EPO levels below a threshold to pass the test. I told you that EPO was not a threshold substance, but you didn't believe me until I proved it to you. You refused to acknowledge that you were wrong about EPO being a threshold substance, but you won't admit it.

I then asked you at least 10 times if you admit that it isn't a threshold substance and your conspiracy theory is wrong. You refused. I asked you to debate it in the thunderdome. You agreed.

When you arrived, you DUCKED the topic (so who had no balls then, huh?) and claimed it now wasn't about threshold substances, when you know I specifically invited you there for that reason ONLY. This can all be verified. You wanted to change the topic. I allowed you to change it because I knew you were wrong anyway.

You lost the debate, and you subsequently accused me of cheating and the judges of cheating. All the while, it was YOU who was trying to cheat. You were just exposed for saying the BAP criteria was NOT in scope (because you were well aware that we were talking about testing circa May 2nd, 2015) but you both during the debate and recently have been trying to include that as in scope. You made up some ridiculous statement that I included it in the scope, when during the debate you kept saying I should stick with the scope, proving that you are a liar and will try anything to cheat and win. Sounds familiar. Everything that you accused me of is what you in fact did. Changing the scope, cheating, outright lying, deflecting, all of that. You know it and I know it. The thing is you did all of that, and you still lost.

Please tell me. How did I cheat? That's what I want to know. Explain it to me. How did I pull off this cheating scheme? YOU chose the judges. You also rejected some judges that I proposed, which shows you had the power to decline judge and I didn't force you to accept any. I encouraged you to look into all of the judges before choosing, and I even told you to look into their posting history and gave you examples of their posting history showing that some were NOT Mayweather fans, or were neutral on the whole Mayweather thing. This can all be proven. Willy Wanker is more of a Pacquiao fan than a Mayweather fan. Billeau2 has taken his share of lumps for admitting he thinks Pacquiao won the Mayweather fight. They both voted against you.

The truth of the matter is, you simply can't handle losing. After you lost, you both accused the judges of either cheating or not being smart enough. None of us, as far as I know, are PED experts. But we all have the ability to use common sense. This entire thread by you was one big deflection to try to crawl your way out of that 4-0 loss, and you already tried it in the debate. You were pushing hard in the end to include the BAP because you thought it might give you a chance since it was referred to as a threshold in the past. Not only did I make it clear that in two separated cases the CAS panel stated that it is in fact NOT a threshold (which you tried to duck by saying that it only stated that it is not a threshold substance, but you can't duck the clear statement given by both panels that it is NOT a "threshold"), but I also told you that even if you want to believe it is a threshold, so be it. It was OUT OF SCOPE. You argued that it wasn't, but your own quotation busts you on that fact.

I told you specifically. Your BAP bullshlt was dismissed on TWO counts. Yet you wanted so badly to keep this going because you can't accept your loss. But you did say that it was out of scope, right? So what is the problem, ADP? That would mean you are left with nothing. All you are left with is the CAS panel saying the WADA criteria are not a threshold. That's when you again try to deflect to your misunderstanding of the discussion about threshold substances (which by the way was proven to be, unlike what you said, worthy for me to place in my opening statement because as you can see, when threshold was brought up in two separate court cases, both stated specifically that it should be noted that EPO is not a threshold substance). Your deflection to that conversation, however, doesn't work because I've proven that the CAS panel completely contradicts the statement you made in your initial statement. You then tried to distance yourself from that statement, but then restated it about a week ago. That proves you had this all wrong. It's a clear shut case and that's why you gained NONE of the votes. You are simply wrong.

You based almost everything toward the end of our debate, and also in here, on a criteria that you admit was out of scope. There should be nothing more to discuss.

You are a grown man that has children. I sincerely feel sorry for your children if their role-model is someone who can never admit when he is wrong, and who then goes on rants trying to lie and cheat when it is proven that he is wrong, just because he has a fanatical adoration for another man.

So please. Explain to me how I cheated you. I would love to hear it!!!! That's all I really want to know from you. Explain how I manipulated the judges despite a CAS panel giving a clear contradictory statement to your stance, and your big evidence being already admitted to being out of scope by you.

I'll wait for it.


By the way, don't talk about declining. I put a long list of what you declined here. The biggest evidence is that we both know this is all about that debate that you lost 4-0. I offered you numerous times a rematch, and you have declined every time. Now you only get a rematch if you honor our first debate, which I'm sure everyone would agree makes sense. But not you. Because you are a biased, squirming, spoiled, feminine brat. Were you an only child?

In any event, looking forward to you explaining how I cheated you. This should be good. I'm all ears.

[ADP02]

No, you didn't provide any acceptable solutions. You are an outright liar. I sincerely feel sorry for you.

Let's take this back to the beginning.


This started out with you saying that Mayweather could reduce his EPO levels below a threshold to pass the test. I told you that EPO was not a threshold substance, but you didn't believe me until I proved it to you. You refused to acknowledge that you were wrong about EPO being a threshold substance, but you won't admit it.

I then asked you at least 10 times if you admit that it isn't a threshold substance and your conspiracy theory is wrong. You refused. I asked you to debate it in the thunderdome. You agreed.

When you arrived, you DUCKED the topic (so who had no balls then, huh?) and claimed it now wasn't about threshold substances, when you know I specifically invited you there for that reason ONLY. This can all be verified. You wanted to change the topic. I allowed you to change it because I knew you were wrong anyway.

You lost the debate, and you subsequently accused me of cheating and the judges of cheating. All the while, it was YOU who was trying to cheat. You were just exposed for saying the BAP criteria was NOT in scope (because you were well aware that we were talking about testing circa May 2nd, 2015) but you both during the debate and recently have been trying to include that as in scope. You made up some ridiculous statement that I included it in the scope, when during the debate you kept saying I should stick with the scope, proving that you are a liar and will try anything to cheat and win. Sounds familiar. Everything that you accused me of is what you in fact did. Changing the scope, cheating, outright lying, deflecting, all of that. You know it and I know it. The thing is you did all of that, and you still lost.

Please tell me. How did I cheat? That's what I want to know. Explain it to me. How did I pull off this cheating scheme? YOU chose the judges. You also rejected some judges that I proposed, which shows you had the power to decline judge and I didn't force you to accept any. I encouraged you to look into all of the judges before choosing, and I even told you to look into their posting history and gave you examples of their posting history showing that some were NOT Mayweather fans, or were neutral on the whole Mayweather thing. This can all be proven. Willy Wanker is more of a Pacquiao fan than a Mayweather fan. Billeau2 has taken his share of lumps for admitting he thinks Pacquiao won the Mayweather fight. They both voted against you.

The truth of the matter is, you simply can't handle losing. After you lost, you both accused the judges of either cheating or not being smart enough. None of us, as far as I know, are PED experts. But we all have the ability to use common sense. This entire thread by you was one big deflection to try to crawl your way out of that 4-0 loss, and you already tried it in the debate. You were pushing hard in the end to include the BAP because you thought it might give you a chance since it was referred to as a threshold in the past. Not only did I make it clear that in two separated cases the CAS panel stated that it is in fact NOT a threshold (which you tried to duck by saying that it only stated that it is not a threshold substance, but you can't duck the clear statement given by both panels that it is NOT a "threshold"), but I also told you that even if you want to believe it is a threshold, so be it. It was OUT OF SCOPE. You argued that it wasn't, but your own quotation busts you on that fact.

I told you specifically. Your BAP bullshlt was dismissed on TWO counts. Yet you wanted so badly to keep this going because you can't accept your loss. But you did say that it was out of scope, right? So what is the problem, ADP? That would mean you are left with nothing. All you are left with is the CAS panel saying the WADA criteria are not a threshold. That's when you again try to deflect to your misunderstanding of the discussion about threshold substances (which by the way was proven to be, unlike what you said, worthy for me to place in my opening statement because as you can see, when threshold was brought up in two separate court cases, both stated specifically that it should be noted that EPO is not a threshold substance). Your deflection to that conversation, however, doesn't work because I've proven that the CAS panel completely contradicts the statement you made in your initial statement. You then tried to distance yourself from that statement, but then restated it about a week ago. That proves you had this all wrong. It's a clear shut case and that's why you gained NONE of the votes. You are simply wrong.

You based almost everything toward the end of our debate, and also in here, on a criteria that you admit was out of scope. There should be nothing more to discuss.

You are a grown man that has children. I sincerely feel sorry for your children if their role-model is someone who can never admit when he is wrong, and who then goes on rants trying to lie and cheat when it is proven that he is wrong, just because he has a fanatical adoration for another man.

So please. Explain to me how I cheated you. I would love to hear it!!!! That's all I really want to know from you. Explain how I manipulated the judges despite a CAS panel giving a clear contradictory statement to your stance, and your big evidence being already admitted to being out of scope by you.

I'll wait for it.


By the way, don't talk about declining. I put a long list of what you declined here. The biggest evidence is that we both know this is all about that debate that you lost 4-0. I offered you numerous times a rematch, and you have declined every time. Now you only get a rematch if you honor our first debate, which I'm sure everyone would agree makes sense. But not you. Because you are a biased, squirming, spoiled, feminine brat. Were you an only child?

In any event, looking forward to you explaining how I cheated you. This should be good. I'm all ears.

LONG QUACK, DUCKER TRAVESTYNY!!!!!

Now how am I supposed to include this mess in my TOP 20 LIST of Travestyny BS DUCKING EXCUSES?


Look bud, you did just like I said you would. You DUCKED OUT!!!!



This CHALLENGE was stated on page #1.


You were OK with the CHALLENGE and you couldn't wait to get started until you realized what the CHALLENGE was about!!!!

So then YOU started by calling your quotes in which said that you couldn't be any CLEARER, VAGUE!!!

Then when I cleared it up for you then you put another 10 roadblocks.


WHY you CHEATED: I explained it to you enough times.




This thread solidified what I told you. That YOU LIED and CHEATED!!!







You cannot even explain WHY those statements that you believe made you win, you cannot even accept a challenge on them.




YOU DOUBLED DOWN on them by constantly posting them. Also, for 2 months we have been arguing on this very thing.



That deserves a CHALLANGE. You were ready to get the judges (no roadblocks) if this was about other arguments or non-arguments.



YOU DUCKED THIS CHALLENGE!!!!!


BUSTED!!!!!

[travestyny]

LONG QUACK, DUCKER TRAVESTYNY!!!!!

Now how am I supposed to include this mess in my TOP 20 LIST of Travestyny BS DUCKING EXCUSES?


Look bud, you did just like I said you would. You DUCKED OUT!!!!



This CHALLENGE was stated on page #1.


You were OK with the CHALLENGE and you couldn't wait to get started until you realized what the CHALLENGE was about!!!!

So then YOU started by calling your quotes in which said that you couldn't be any CLEARER, VAGUE!!!

Then when I cleared it up for you then you put another 10 roadblocks.


WHY you CHEATED: I explained it to you enough times.




This thread solidified what I told you. That YOU LIED and CHEATED!!!







You cannot even explain WHY those statements that you believe made you win, you cannot even accept a challenge on them.




YOU DOUBLED DOWN on them by constantly posting them. Also, for 2 months we have been arguing on this very thing.



That deserves a CHALLANGE. You were ready to get the judges (no roadblocks) if this was about other arguments or non-arguments.



YOU DUCKED THIS CHALLENGE!!!!!


BUSTED!!!!!

And you're still going acting like a little bltch.



I told you. Explain how I cheated. Come on. I'm all ears. Let's see what you got.....

You claiming that I refused to accept a challenge on the statements....yet I've already proven that I've proposed a number of challenges on that court case that you all DECLINED. I even proposed a rematch that you DECLINED.

You're not fooling anyone. Everything that happened here is written in stone.


Now come on, you little whiny bltch. Explain how I cheated.

or if you're just a butthurt bltch that can't accept that he lost.


Defend yourself.

[travestyny]

BUSTED!!!!![/SIZE]

ADP02: "WAHHHHHH WAHHHHH YOU CHEATED"


TRAVESTYNY: "YOU WANT A REMATCH. YES OR NO."


ADP02: "No. There is no point."

How big of a bltch are you???

[ADP02]

And you're still going acting like a little bltch.



I told you. Explain how I cheated. Come on. I'm all ears. Let's see what you got.....


or if you're just a butthurt bltch that can't accept that he lost.


Defend yourself.

Sure, I will AGAIN

but

this is my thread

and

YOU have yet to explain ONCE

WHY you are DUCKING this CHALLENGE!!!!





Go first! Well, second since I already answered this!!!


.

[travestyny]

Sure, I will AGAIN

but

this is my thread

and

YOU have yet to explain ONCE

WHY you are DUCKING this CHALLENGE!!!!

There is no challenge that I've ducked, but there are plenty that you ducked that were SPECIFICALLY ON THE CASE.

TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.

ADP DECLINED

Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!

ADP DECLINED

You also declined the rematch!!!!!

By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

SO WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU CRYING ABOUT? CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT'S WRONG WITH ANY ONE OF THOSE TOPICS????

[ADP02]

ADP02: "WAHHHHHH WAHHHHH YOU CHEATED"


TRAVESTYNY: "YOU WANT A REMATCH. YES OR NO."


ADP02: "No. There is no point."

How big of a bltch are you???

I actually accepted but you are the one that refused that challenge too!!!!


BUSTED!!!!


.

[travestyny]

I actually accepted but you are the one that refused that challenge too!!!!


BUSTED!!!!


.

So this is you accepting the rematch??????

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

LOOKS LIKE A DECLINE TO ME!

[ADP02]

So this is you accepting the rematch??????








LOOKS LIKE A DECLINE TO ME!

WOW!!!!

When was that, today? Yesterday? NOPE!!!!




BUSTED!!!!