Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
So the question is simple.
Judges, please find where we agreed to the terms of this debate. Also where we specifically BOTH agreed to exclude something from the scope.
Then I will bring up the statement that we did agree to:
"Can or does ……"
You responding with
"I'm fine with that"
BTW - Our statements do not reflect what we agreed to. Go check out what travestyny said! It is basically 99% on what we excluded from the scope!!! WTF
The only thing relevant is that Travestyny said "WADA DOCUMENTS" are in scope!!!
travestyny will now try to prove that a statement means that it encompasses everything that we said in our agreement. Now, go look at his statement. Do you think that his statement encompasses our agreement? Or was he writing about something entirely different?
.
Comment