Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[ShoulderRoll]

Have another parallelogram

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=401045

[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

"Blue parallelograms."

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[travestyny]

By the way, did you see your Blue Parallelogram thread got bumped? Go check it out

[ADP02]

I clicked on the link hoping its a link stating that you TRAVESTYNY are WRONG!!!!

.... but unfortunately, it was just a DEFLECTION to something we both know is a LIE!!!

EPO testing can have thresholds ..... you said they cannot. I didn't see anything about that .... all I saw was you keep on saying EPO is not a threshold substance.

and now you are basically confusing those statements from the panel that is about threshold substances and well the panel is telling YOU and the athlete that EPO is not tested that way!!!!

Sorry!



.

Why you scared then, ADP. I’m giving you a chance to not go down as a 4-0 loser.

You’ll go down as a 8-0 loser instead

Still running scared? Yea, that’s what I thought. Now shut up and keep ducking the challenge. You know you’ll get bodied in 1 page. Go cry about your loss to someone who cares.


EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?

Court of Arbitration for Sport!

You think the court just brought up threshold substances out of the blue, you complete moron???? They were explaining it to the athlete just like I have explained it to your dumb ass.

BECAUSE YOU DID THINK EPO WAS A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE, DIDN'T YOU. THAT SHOWS YOUR CONFUSION. DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT SAY THAT THE LIST OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES WAS A PARTIAL LIST BECAUSE EPO WASN'T ON IT??????

WHAT DID YOU MEAN BY THAT, HUH ADP???? LMAOOOOO

On top of that, why are you saying there is a threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance?????



You're so ****** that you even doubled down on this!




AND THE COURT DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS THAT. For you to make such a blunder by repeating that shows how truly lost you are!!!! Your brain has turned to complete, utter shlt.

OWNED.

Man, you still think that EPO testing cannot have a threshold test?

I know that I am 100% right.

I wished it was as easy as asking 3-4 people to judge because you are the one who posted all that and believe that YET YOU Travestyny, do not know what the freak you read!

And YOU have actually looked at this much much more than someone who would read a few posts and judge. That is, it will be people with little to no knowledge will be judging.




PLUS .....




As I told Shoulder Roll, ,.... I need good judges who can get down and understand this ..... and the names that I gave him were Dr Catlin, Dr Segura, Dr Ayotte,... and or maybe someone from the CAS panel! You know, objective people who I know will give us the correct response(s) to our question.

So what I am saying is, I want the winner to be truly the winner, ... even if it is not me .....


Who are the judges that you are thinking about getting? LarryXXX, Big Dunn, Reloaded and Dosumpthin - With Alternate judge as Shoulder Roll?

Well, I doubt you would make it this obvious this time, right?



From his posts, it sounds like Shoulder Roll is already itching to supply you with names!!!



.

[travestyny]

Man, you still think that EPO testing cannot have a threshold test?

I know that I am 100% right.

I wished it was as easy as asking 3-4 people to judge because you are the one who posted all that and believe that YET YOU Travestyny, do not know what the freak you read!

And YOU have actually looked at this much much more than someone who would read a few posts and judge. That is, it will be people with little to no knowledge will be judging.




PLUS .....




As I told Shoulder Roll, ,.... I need good judges who can get down and understand this ..... and the names that I gave him were Dr Catlin, Dr Segura, Dr Ayotte,... and or maybe someone from the CAS panel! You know, objective people who I know will give us the correct response(s) to our question.

So what I am saying is, I want the winner to be truly the winner, ... even if it is not me .....


Who are the judges that you are thinking about getting? LarryXXX, Big Dunn, Reloaded and Dosumpthin - With Alternate judge as Shoulder Roll?

Well, I doubt you would make it this obvious this time, right?



From his posts, it sounds like Shoulder Roll is already itching to supply you with names!!!



.

Let me try to help you out then. I will dumb this down as much as possible for you.


Here is your statement.

The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

exceeds = goes above, right? Good.








Here is the court's statement.

there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

non-human production of the substance = synthetic EPO, right?

So what we have is:

Your statement:

There is a threshold above which it can be said there is synthetic EPO.

The Court's Statement:

There is no threshold above which it can be said there is synthetic EPO.

Just stop. It’s over.

[ADP02]

Let me try to help you out then. I will dumb this down as much as possible for you.


Here is your statement.


exceeds = goes above, right? Good.








Here is the court's statement.


non-human production of the substance = synthetic EPO, right?

So what we have is:

Your statement:


The Court's Statement:


Just stop. It’s over.

Just say this:

I, TRavestyny am WRONG!!!!!



I was thinking ..... maybe we can contact by way of an email someone such as :
Dr Catlin or Dr Segura .....


It would be a funny email:

Hi,

I know someone ..... , Travestyny, who thinks that YOU ARE ALL WRONG when it comes to EPO testing. Travestyny thinks that for EPO there cannot be a threshold type test for it. I disagree with him.

After you stop laughing (I know you will need a few days to stop laughing), can you please respond by stating why is ....

TRAVESTYNY WRONG!!!!!

.



.

[warrenchico]

[travestyny]

Just say this:

I, TRavestyny am WRONG!!!!!



I was thinking ..... maybe we can contact by way of an email someone such as :
Dr Catlin or Dr Segura .....


It would be a funny:




.



.

You are an absolute moron.

My information is based on the Court of Arbitration for Sport, who told you specifically that you are wrong. You refuse to accept it. I guess the court isn’t enough for you to accept that you are wrong.

Of all the posters here, you think that you are the only one smart enough to understand this. The reason you got decapitated 4-0 is precisely because of that attitude. You think you are smarter than everyone else.

You aren’t, and you are wrong. Stop being a pvssy and accept the challenge. If not, stop writing to me. I have no desire to keep talking to you about what was so obvious that you lost 4-0 after you chose the judges yourself.


And as I said before, keep insinuating that the judges were cheating, and I'll invite every last one of them to this thread to embarrass you like they've already done in the past. YOU CHOSE THEM you sore loser piece of shlt.

[ADP02]

You are an absolute moron.

My information is based on the Court of Arbitration for Sport, who told you specifically that you are wrong. You refuse to accept it. I guess the court isn’t enough for you to accept that you are wrong.

Of all the posters here, you think that you are the only one smart enough to understand this. The reason you got decapitated 4-0 is precisely because of that attitude. You think you are smarter than everyone else.

You aren’t, and you are wrong. Stop being a pvssy and accept the challenge. If not, stop writing to me. I have no desire to keep talking to you about what was so obvious that you lost 4-0 after you chose the judges yourself.


And as I said before, keep insinuating that the judges were cheating, and I'll invite every last one of them to this thread to embarrass you like they've already done in the past. YOU CHOSE THEM you sore loser piece of shlt.

Make me correct you AGAIN!

You think that the CAS panel is stating something BUT you misinterpreted what they are trying to tell the athlete!!!!! It is simple as that!





Sorry but you thought it went "smoothly" because of the score but the truth is that you kept on complaining from the start what we were arguing about .... Yes, even after you agreed to discuss something as simple as "Does EPO have threshold type tests" .... you then tried to limit the conversation even though there was never an agreement to limit the conversation .... and you said some things that were NOT true.

No ref and no judges to make sure that we didn't go off on a tangent!

It became a Kangaroo type court! Simple as that.


Examples:
- Judges were to provide a reason to why they thought the person should get the vote. Only 1 actually did that but they also used incorrect information to come to their conclusion!

- You took statements from WADA document that YOU thought meant something but I corrected YOU .... You know, similar to now!

- That judge didn't respond to my statement which corrected his analysis. Even though he even asked!

- At least 1 judge voted NOT on the discussion but on something else. That you were there 24/7 but I couldn't be.

- The last judge voted even though I specifically told him to not until I was satisfied that he understood the discussion. He went ahead and voted anyways .... after the fact, he just said, yup, I understood!



Then I find out that 3 of 4 judges are friends. The first vote came from a Mayweather Mafia groupie. You twisted it and said that I accepted them. Dumb of you since that is not the point. I said it from the start, that I didn't want those type of judges and I cannot know without them telling me. Yet, him and his friends were judges.


and that is about the judges.






Then there is YOU:
- You didn't even remember what you stated at the start. Initially you said that there are no threshold tests at all and ......

- You said, there are no thresholds, ratios, .... none of that! WRONG!!! I corrected you!

- You said, it's not about the intensity of the bands. I corrected you!

- You said, after you realized your mistake, well, if there is, it maybe not on the confirmation but perhaps the presumptive tests. So you tried to limit it to confirmation test. Even here, go check out what you said initially! You specifically said there is NOT for BOTH!!! LOL .... like I said, Kangaroo court!!!


- You deflected on ABP testing ... even though we both know that I brought up those examples such as HT thresholds and you said that was an old information. Man, I remember us even discussing studies on that!!!!

- ABP is referenced even in the EPO document. EPO is tested both directly and indirectly. 1.5 years later, you finally admitted that there are thresholds! Case closed right there. Lets make sure that you tell that to the judges! Oooops!

- You wanted to limit the discussion (after the fact) yet, you were trying to convince the judges based on a case from 2003-2004 period!!! Especially for 1 of the judges, he based it on that!


- You said there were no thresholds referred to but even in that document, they referred to it implicitly and explicitly. ABP thresholds and other threshold tests!

- I said to you at the start, I will be explaining everything as we go. I cannot do that in 1 or 2 posts. I even had a note stating so. Again, that didn't stop you from trying to limit it to a word that I said (Got you games brought to you by Travestyny!) .... instead of trying to understand where I was coming from.


- Your misunderstanding continues today.



- I even heard that you were DQd recently for not following rules. Is that true? So you lost, right? Or was this another Kanhgaroo type court? Just asking.

.