Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

No, That is you saying that I am smarter than others. Thanks for the compliment but I never said that.


I just told you who are the real experts and you got all defensive about it.





You misunderstood this statement. The athlete said the BAP threshold is the only valid criteria. The panel disagreed that there is such a rule. Here is what was said just before that statement



then the panel also said "

So the panel is telling the athlete and YOU that the BAP threshold rule is but a single test.

the panel is stating that other tests can be used as well to verify if there is presence of rEPO. That is what you cannot seem to understand. The T/E Ratio test is but a single test. Another type of test, say CIR test can give a different result or conclusion than the T/E Ratio test. That other test does not make T/E Ratio test no longer a threshold test. That is absurd!!!! Same with my other example for the other non-threshold substance. the panel agreed that not all 4 threshold tests need to be proven. Only 1 of the tests is sufficient.


Did the UCI have any of those other tests in their rules? No but they too can still be used to detect the presence of rEPO. In fact it was the labs back then that had these test criteria. At that time, the athlete was positive only when over the 80% threshold. The time of the case, it became a sort of grey zone because of the new information and transition that was to occur .... but that can be the case with other substances as well including threshold substances!

But the test was a threshold type test. Everyone said so .... but you got confused. Badly!


I sufficiently explained my statement that you quoted. It's just too bad that you cannot understand. Sorry!



.

If a numeric limit does not exist, then what is the threshold, ADP???

Oh...and don't forget this:

The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

THE BAP IS NOT WHAT...??? What part of that statement don't you understand???

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

Did 5 people tell you that you are wrong?


Did no people tell you that you are right?


I thought so Go away. I'm tired of humiliating you. Seriously.

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[travestyny]

Yo ADP02, come accept another challenge. Vagisil was real hurt by what happened to you last time. You know...losing 4-0 and all

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[travestyny]

You been stuck on ****** with this same post probably over 50 times

I never knew I could hurt someone's feelings online so badly.

[ADP02]

If a numeric limit does not exist, then what is the threshold, ADP???

Oh...and don't forget this:



THE BAP IS NOT WHAT...??? What part of that statement don't you understand???



Did 5 people tell you that you are wrong?


Did no people tell you that you are right?


I thought so Go away. I'm tired of humiliating you. Seriously.

Are you dense?


Because you didn't understand this:

The athlete said that there is only 1 test allowed for EPO.

The panel responded and said

"The rules provide that the presence of rEPO can be proven by any means. A numeric limit does not exist. "

The panel told you that there is no rule to say that the lab has to use just a single test and explained that it is not like the threshold substance nandrolone. They can use multiple tests if that is required and available. So if that is the case, there is no numeric limit. It does NOT exist!!!

Once you understand, you will be doing this!

.

[travestyny]

Are you dense?


Because you didn't understand this:

The athlete said that there is only 1 test allowed for EPO.

The panel responded and said





The panel told you that there is no rule to say that the lab has to use just a single test and explained that it is not like the threshold substance nandrolone. They can use multiple tests if that is required and available. So if that is the case, there is no numeric limit. It does NOT exist!!!

Once you understand, you will be doing this!

.

Nah, but you are dense. What does this mean, ADP?

The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

So when this says specifically that the BAP does not represent a threshold....you interpret that as...the BAP represents a threshold???

You are an imbecile. Sorry, loser


Oh, and why keep ducking the question, hmm? If there is NO NUMERICAL LIMIT....THEN WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD???? LMAOOO! You're saying this case was only about whether they could use other tests... and that's it? LMAO. Please tell me what the "threshold" was so I can embarrass you more and expose you.

Give up.

[ShoulderRoll]

Are you dense?


Because you didn't understand this:

The athlete said that there is only 1 test allowed for EPO.

The panel responded and said





The panel told you that there is no rule to say that the lab has to use just a single test and explained that it is not like the threshold substance nandrolone. They can use multiple tests if that is required and available. So if that is the case, there is no numeric limit. It does NOT exist!!!

Once you understand, you will be doing this!

.

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

[Spoon23]

Here you go Mayweather... You've bamboozled the public long enough..

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...eathers-legacy

Floyd a Farce? PED Report Further Clouds Mayweather's Legacy


Oh my, damaging indeed.

[ADP02]

Nah, but you are dense. What does this mean, ADP?




So when this says specifically that the BAP does not represent a threshold....you interpret that as...the BAP represents a threshold???

You are an imbecile. Sorry, loser


Oh, and why keep ducking the question, hmm? If there is NO NUMERICAL LIMIT....THEN WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD???? LMAOOO! You're saying this case was only about whether they could use other tests... and that's it? LMAO. Please tell me what the "threshold" was so I can embarrass you more and expose you.

Give up.

You keep on asking me and I keep on telling you!!!!

BUT you are NOT getting it!!!!

"not a threshold of human body production"

Is rEPO produced by humans? NO!!!!

rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

Instead the BAP and other criteria (tests) are used to detect "non-human EPO".

How?

By verifying the results of an "an image from the electropherogram"



I broke it down to make it so so simple that you can even understand?




but but how about this

"NO NUMERICAL LIMIT"

Remember that the panel's statement included the phrase "BY ANY MEANs"

There are several criteria that can be used to test for the detection of rEPO so it is a more qualitative approach not a single quantitative numerical limit (result) that they are using ....... DING DING DING!!!!








So do you have any other questions that you cannot seem to understand?

oh, and you will be thanking me once you realize the truth!